Burnside vs Coes Creek
Burnside is the younger of the two, with a median age of 37 against 43 in Coes Creek. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and about half of households are couple families.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Burnside
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (9 vs 1)
- has more schools inside the suburb (4 vs 0)
- But Coes Creek has more separate houses rather than flats (99% vs 88%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Burnside
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (46/100 vs 38/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Burnside
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (12% vs 1%)
- is more walkable (46/100 vs 38/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Burnside
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (28.9% vs 8.8%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Burnside and Coes Creek drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Burnside has more residents (3,104 vs 1,515); Coes Creek skews older (43 vs 37).
| Burnside | Coes Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,104 +51% vs other | 1,515 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +28.9% | +8.8% |
| Median age | 37 | 43 |
| Median household income | $84,552/yr | $84,656/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $420/wk | $443/wk +5% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.0%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.9%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Burnside | Coes Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $960,000 | $930,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $585,000 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 20 days from 19 sales | 24 days from 8 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
23 vs 25 sales
36 vs 21 sales
Development activity
| Burnside | Coes Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 2,962 across Sunshine Coast same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -41% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Burnside | Coes Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.4% $850/wk on $1M | 4.7% $950/wk on $1.06M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Burnside | Coes Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 58% of QLD same for both | |
| Schools | Higher than 28% of QLD | — |
| Walkability | Higher than 86% of QLD | Higher than 84% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 79% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 81% of QLD | Higher than 85% of QLD |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 73% of QLD | Higher than 81% of QLD |
Liveability
Burnside is more walkable (46 vs 38); Coes Creek scores higher overall (66 vs 56).
| Burnside | Coes Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 56/100 | 66/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 |
Risk profile
| Burnside | Coes Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 14/100 | Low 20/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 4 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Burnside | Coes Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 4 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 3 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Burnside
- Burnside State High School Government · Secondary at peers
- Burnside State School Government · Primary at peers
- St John's College Catholic · Secondary at peers
- Nambour Special School Government · Combined · Special school
Schools in Coes Creek
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Burnside | Coes Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 4 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 9 | 1 |
| Childcare | 2 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 11 | 1 |
Mobility
| Burnside | Coes Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 46/100 | 38/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 104.6 km | 104.2 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 86 min | 85 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.9% postcode 4560 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 74 postcode 4560 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (83.3%).
Setting
| Burnside | Coes Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 36 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 58 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 13.8 km | 12.9 km |
NBN connectivity
| Burnside | Coes Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 72/100 | 75/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 50% 1,423 premises | 55% 598 premises |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Burnside | Coes Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 4.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 12.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Burnside | Coes Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,690/yr same for both | |
| Council | Sunshine Coast same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Burnside | Coes Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Fairfax same for both | |
| Member | Ted O'Brien same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Burnside | Coes Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Burnside
Coes Creek
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Burnside
Other comparisons with Coes Creek
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.