Bungowannah vs Splitters Creek
Bungowannah is the younger of the two, with a median age of 44 against 47 in Splitters Creek. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and the large majority of households are couple families.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Bungowannah
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (13/100 vs 45/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Bungowannah
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper land ($560,000 vs $910,000)
Weighs land prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Splitters Creek
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (6% vs 12%)
- has cheaper rent ($168/wk vs $225/wk)
- But Bungowannah has a bigger rental market to choose from (20% vs 7%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Bungowannah
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (13/100 vs 45/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Splitters Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (16.9% vs 10.1%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Bungowannah and Splitters Creek drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Splitters Creek has more residents (312 vs 175); Splitters Creek has higher household incomes ($154,336 vs $99,112).
| Bungowannah | Splitters Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 175 | 312 +78% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +10.1% | +16.9% |
| Median age | 44 | 47 |
| Median household income | $99,112/yr | $154,336/yr +56% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $225/wk +25% vs other | $168/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.2%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.8%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Bungowannah | Splitters Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $1,130,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $560,000 | $910,000 |
Zoning mix
Bungowannah has more rural and farming land (98% vs 22%); Splitters Creek has more land zoned for conservation (47% vs 2%).
| Bungowannah | Splitters Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 98% | 22% |
| Environmental | 2% | 47% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 1% | 28% |
| Residential | 0% | 3% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Bungowannah | Splitters Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 86 across Greater Hume | 423 across Albury |
| Approvals change year on year | +33% | +14% |
Ranking within NSW
| Bungowannah | Splitters Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — | Higher than 59% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 67% of NSW | Higher than 95% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 56% of NSW | Higher than 67% of NSW |
| Affordability | — | Higher than 83% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 63% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 41% of NSW | Higher than 28% of NSW |
Liveability
| Bungowannah | Splitters Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Splitters Creek carries more crime risk (45 vs 13); Splitters Creek carries more bushfire risk (78 vs 65).
| Bungowannah | Splitters Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 65/100 | High 78/100 |
| Crime | Low 13/100 | Moderate 45/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Bungowannah | Splitters Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Bungowannah | Splitters Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 2 |
| Waterways | 6 | 8 |
Mobility
| Bungowannah | Splitters Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 10/100 | 17/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 565.2 km same for both | |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 351 min | 354 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 2640 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 54 postcode 2640 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (73.2%).
Setting
| Bungowannah | Splitters Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 163 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 236 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Bungowannah | Splitters Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 28/100 | 19/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Satellite (Sky Muster) |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 72 premises | 0% 45 premises |
Climate
| Bungowannah | Splitters Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 700 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Bungowannah | Splitters Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 7.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 18.1 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.64 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Bungowannah | Splitters Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $992/yr | $1,574/yr |
| Council | Greater Hume | Albury |
Federal electorate
| Bungowannah | Splitters Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Farrer same for both | |
| Member | David Farley same for both | |
| Party | One Nation same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Bungowannah | Splitters Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Bungowannah
Splitters Creek
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Bungowannah
Other comparisons with Splitters Creek
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.