Bungama vs Napperby
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Bungama, about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Bungama tends to suit families with children and couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Napperby
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more childcare (3 vs 0)
- carries lower crime risk (35/100 vs 70/100)
- But Bungama is already more of a family suburb (68% vs 57%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Napperby
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($250/wk vs $300/wk)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Bungama sits closer to the CBD (221.3 km vs 223.7 km)
- Napperby is more walkable (32/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Napperby
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (32/100 vs 0/100)
- carries lower crime risk (35/100 vs 70/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Bungama
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (5.5% vs 0.2%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Bungama and Napperby drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Napperby has more residents (666 vs 116); Bungama rents higher ($300/wk vs $250/wk).
| Bungama | Napperby | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 116 | 666 +474% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +5.5% | +0.2% |
| Median age | 44 same for both | |
| Median household income | $68,224/yr +10% vs other | $61,152/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $300/wk +17% vs other | $250/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.7%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.4%).
Property market
| Bungama | Napperby | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $435,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $126,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 105 days from 5 sales |
Zoning mix
Napperby has more land zoned for conservation (12% vs 0%); Bungama has more rural and farming land (98% vs 87%).
| Bungama | Napperby | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 98% | 87% |
| Environmental | 0% | 12% |
| Industrial | 2% | 0% |
| Residential | 0% | 1% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Bungama | Napperby | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 53 across Port Pirie same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +75% same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Bungama | Napperby | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 37% of SA | Higher than 29% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 30% of SA | Higher than 76% of SA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 23% of SA same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 60% of SA | Higher than 61% of SA |
Liveability
Napperby is more walkable (32 vs 0).
| Bungama | Napperby | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | D |
| Score | — | 28/100 |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 | below-average income decile 2/10 |
Risk profile
Napperby carries more bushfire risk (80 vs 0); Bungama carries more flood risk (73 vs 13).
| Bungama | Napperby | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | High 80/100 |
| Crime | High 70/100 | Low 35/100 |
| Flood | High 73/100 | Low 13/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km | 0 within 5 km |
Schools
| Bungama | Napperby | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
Schools in Bungama
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Napperby
- Napperby Primary School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Bungama | Napperby | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 1 |
| Childcare | 0 | 3 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 1 |
Mobility
Napperby sits further from the CBD (223.7 km vs 221.3 km).
| Bungama | Napperby | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 32/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 221.3 km | 223.7 km +1% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 145 min | 148 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.2% postcode 5540 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 58 postcode 5540 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (87.2%).
Setting
| Bungama | Napperby | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 9 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 103 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 6.6 km 4.9 km to a named beach | 7.5 km |
NBN connectivity
| Bungama | Napperby | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 54 premises | 0% 265 premises |
Climate
| Bungama | Napperby | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 472 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Bungama | Napperby | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | — same for both | |
| PM10 | 23.7 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Bungama | Napperby | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,855/yr same for both | |
| Council | Port Pirie same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Bungama | Napperby | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Grey same for both | |
| Member | Tom Venning same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Bungama | Napperby | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Napperby
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Bungama
Other comparisons with Napperby
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.