Bungama vs Coonamia
Coonamia is the younger of the two, with a median age of 40 against 44 in Bungama. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Bungama, about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Bungama tends to suit families with children and couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Coonamia
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (17/100 vs 70/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Coonamia
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (17% vs 23%)
- has cheaper rent ($250/wk vs $300/wk)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Bungama has more residents already 65 and over (17% vs 6%)
- Coonamia carries lower crime risk (17/100 vs 70/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Bungama
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (5.5% vs -15.0%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Bungama and Coonamia drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Bungama rents higher ($300/wk vs $250/wk); Coonamia has higher household incomes ($76,648 vs $68,224).
| Bungama | Coonamia | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 116 +17% vs other | 96 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +5.5% | -15.0% |
| Median age | 44 | 40 |
| Median household income | $68,224/yr | $76,648/yr +12% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $300/wk +17% vs other | $250/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.7%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.9%).
Zoning mix
| Bungama | Coonamia | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 98% | 100% |
| Industrial | 2% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Bungama | Coonamia | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 53 across Port Pirie same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +75% same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Bungama | Coonamia | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 37% of SA | Higher than 52% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 30% of SA | Higher than 59% of SA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 23% of SA same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 60% of SA | Higher than 62% of SA |
Liveability
| Bungama | Coonamia | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Bungama carries more crime risk (70 vs 17); Coonamia carries more flood risk (92 vs 73).
| Bungama | Coonamia | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | High 70/100 | Low 17/100 |
| Flood | High 73/100 | High 92/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km | 4 within 5 km |
Schools
| Bungama | Coonamia | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Mobility
| Bungama | Coonamia | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 4/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 221.3 km | 223.2 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 145 min | 146 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.2% postcode 5540 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 58 postcode 5540 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (87.5%).
Setting
| Bungama | Coonamia | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 9 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 7 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 6.6 km 4.9 km to a named beach | 4.3 km 2.4 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Bungama | Coonamia | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 54 premises | 0% 52 premises |
Climate
| Bungama | Coonamia | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 472 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Bungama | Coonamia | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | — same for both | |
| PM10 | 23.7 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Bungama | Coonamia | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,855/yr same for both | |
| Council | Port Pirie same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Bungama | Coonamia | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Grey same for both | |
| Member | Tom Venning same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Bungama | Coonamia | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Bungama
Other comparisons with Coonamia
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.