Bung Bong vs Avoca
Avoca is the younger of the two, with a median age of 51 against 59 in Bung Bong. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Bung Bong, the large majority of households are people living alone. In Avoca, about half of households are people living alone. On these figures, Bung Bong tends to suit people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Avoca
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (6 vs 2)
- has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
- But Bung Bong carries lower crime risk (26/100 vs 59/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, and childcare.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Bung Bong
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (16% vs 23%)
- has cheaper rent ($160/wk vs $210/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Bung Bong sits closer to the CBD (176.9 km vs 183.1 km)
- Avoca is more walkable (42/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Bung Bong
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (26/100 vs 59/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (38% vs 32%)
- But Avoca is more walkable (42/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Bung Bong
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (23.5% vs 13.7%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Bung Bong and Avoca drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Avoca has more residents (1,356 vs 63); Avoca rents higher ($210/wk vs $160/wk).
| Bung Bong | Avoca | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 63 | 1,356 +2052% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +23.5% | +13.7% |
| Median age | 59 | 51 |
| Median household income | $50,908/yr +6% vs other | $47,996/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $160/wk | $210/wk +31% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (6.3%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.6%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Bung Bong | Avoca | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $397,500 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $128,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 54 days from 22 sales |
Zoning mix
| Bung Bong | Avoca | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 78% | 77% |
| Parks and recreation | 18% | 17% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 1% | 2% |
| Environmental | 2% | 1% |
| Residential | 0% | 2% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Bung Bong | Avoca | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 40 across Central Goldfields | 45 across Pyrenees |
| Approvals change year on year | +129% | +100% |
Gross rental yield
| Bung Bong | Avoca | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 3.2% $370/wk on $604K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Bung Bong | Avoca | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — | Higher than 8% of VIC |
| Income | Higher than 10% of VIC | Higher than 8% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 56% of VIC | Higher than 85% of VIC |
| Affordability | — | Higher than 58% of VIC |
| EV adoption | Higher than 14% of VIC | — |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 15% of VIC | Higher than 95% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 21% of VIC |
Liveability
Avoca is more walkable (42 vs 0).
| Bung Bong | Avoca | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | C |
| Score | — | 31/100 |
| Socio-economic band | high-need area decile 1/10 | below-average income decile 2/10 |
Risk profile
Bung Bong carries more flood risk (61 vs 0); Avoca carries more crime risk (59 vs 26).
| Bung Bong | Avoca | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 78/100 | High 75/100 |
| Crime | Low 26/100 | Moderate 59/100 |
| Flood | Moderate 61/100 | None 0/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Bung Bong | Avoca | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Bung Bong
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Avoca
- Avoca Primary School Government · Primary above peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Bung Bong | Avoca | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 6 |
| Childcare | 0 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 1 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 2 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 1 |
| EV chargers | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 5 | 13 |
Mobility
Avoca sits further from the CBD (183.1 km vs 176.9 km).
| Bung Bong | Avoca | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 42/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 176.9 km | 183.1 km +4% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 132 min | 128 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.2% postcode 3465 | 0.0% postcode 3467 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 36 postcode 3465 | 55 postcode 3467 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (72.3%).
Setting
| Bung Bong | Avoca | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 279 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 232 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Bung Bong | Avoca | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 18/100 | 89/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 17 premises | 59% 745 premises |
Climate
| Bung Bong | Avoca | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 508 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Bung Bong | Avoca | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,555/yr | $1,584/yr |
| Council | Central Goldfields | Pyrenees |
Federal electorate
| Bung Bong | Avoca | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Mallee same for both | |
| Member | Anne Webster same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Bung Bong | Avoca | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Bung Bong
Other comparisons with Avoca
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.