Bundagen vs Repton
Repton is the younger of the two, with a median age of 49 against 52 in Bundagen. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Bundagen, about half of households are people living alone. In Repton, about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Bundagen tends to suit people living alone, while Repton suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Repton
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (42/100 vs 75/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (62% vs 42%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Bundagen
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper rent ($30/wk vs $405/wk)
- leaves renters under less rental stress (4% vs 27%)
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (25% vs 10%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Repton
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (29/100 vs 0/100)
- has a shorter drive in (331 min vs 345 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (511.3 km vs 514.8 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Repton
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (29/100 vs 0/100)
- carries lower crime risk (42/100 vs 75/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Repton
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (3.3% vs -28.9%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Bundagen and Repton drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Repton rents higher ($405/wk vs $30/wk); Repton has more residents (667 vs 96).
| Bundagen | Repton | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 96 | 667 +595% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -28.9% | +3.3% |
| Median age | 52 | 49 |
| Median household income | $37,700/yr | $76,960/yr +104% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $30/wk | $405/wk +1250% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.8%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.2%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Bundagen | Repton | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $1,050,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $1,700,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 52 days from 6 sales |
Zoning mix
Bundagen has more land zoned for conservation (90% vs 46%); Repton has more rural and farming land (27% vs 9%).
| Bundagen | Repton | |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental | 90% | 46% |
| Rural and farming | 9% | 27% |
| Residential | 0% | 25% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 1% same for both | |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Bundagen | Repton | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 356 across Coffs Harbour | 40 across Bellingen |
| Approvals change year on year | +61% | +12% |
Ranking within NSW
| Bundagen | Repton | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — | Higher than 61% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 3% of NSW | Higher than 45% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 19% of NSW | Higher than 74% of NSW |
| Affordability | — | Higher than 33% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 79% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 29% of NSW | Higher than 65% of NSW |
Liveability
Repton is more walkable (29 vs 0).
| Bundagen | Repton | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | C |
| Score | — | 34/100 |
| Socio-economic band | high-need area decile 1/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 |
Risk profile
Bundagen carries more crime risk (75 vs 42).
| Bundagen | Repton | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 67/100 | High 71/100 |
| Crime | High 75/100 | Moderate 42/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | High 73/100 | None 0/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Bundagen | Repton | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Bundagen
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Repton
- Repton Public School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Bundagen | Repton | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 6 | 5 |
Mobility
Bundagen sits further from the CBD (514.8 km vs 511.3 km).
| Bundagen | Repton | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 29/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 514.8 km | 511.3 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 345 min | 331 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.9% postcode 2454 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 70 postcode 2454 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (100.0%).
Setting
| Bundagen | Repton | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 19 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 46 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 1.5 km 2.2 km to a named beach | 2.4 km 3.0 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Bundagen | Repton | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 20/100 | 44/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) | Fibre to the node |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 35 premises | 0% 287 premises |
Climate
| Bundagen | Repton | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,827 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Bundagen | Repton | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 4.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 10.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.22 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Bundagen | Repton | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,437/yr | $1,592/yr |
| Council | Coffs Harbour | Bellingen |
Federal electorate
| Bundagen | Repton | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Cowper same for both | |
| Member | Pat Conaghan same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Bundagen | Repton | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Bundagen
Other comparisons with Repton
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.