Buller vs White Peak
White Peak is the younger of the two, with a median age of 36 against 48 in Buller. In both, the large majority of households own their home and most homes are detached houses. In Buller, about half of households are couple families. In White Peak, the large majority of households are couple families. On these figures, Buller tends to suit people living alone and older residents, while White Peak suits families with children and couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
White Peak
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more separate houses rather than flats (100% vs 68%)
- is already more of a family suburb (87% vs 60%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
White Peak
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (20% vs 28%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Buller
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (288 min vs 294 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (429.8 km vs 434.7 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Buller
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more residents already 65 and over (21% vs 12%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Buller and White Peak drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
White Peak has more residents (587 vs 159); White Peak has higher household incomes ($134,108 vs $92,612).
| Buller | White Peak | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 159 | 587 +269% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +31.4% | +32.8% |
| Median age | 48 | 36 |
| Median household income | $92,612/yr | $134,108/yr +45% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $255/wk +2% vs other | $250/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.8%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Buller | White Peak | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $698,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $291,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 51 days from 5 sales |
Development activity
| Buller | White Peak | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 22 across Chapman Valley same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +100% same for both | |
Ranking within WA
| Buller | White Peak | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 56% of WA | Higher than 92% of WA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 62% of WA | Higher than 57% of WA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 24% of WA same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 64% of WA | Higher than 58% of WA |
Liveability
| Buller | White Peak | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | B |
| Score | — | 49/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
White Peak carries more bushfire risk (28 vs 0).
| Buller | White Peak | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Low 28/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 51/100 | Moderate 55/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | High 73/100 | None 0/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Buller | White Peak | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Buller | White Peak | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 2 |
| Waterways | 1 | 0 |
Mobility
White Peak sits further from the CBD (434.7 km vs 429.8 km).
| Buller | White Peak | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Perth | 429.8 km | 434.7 km +1% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 288 min | 294 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.2% postcode 6532 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 60 postcode 6532 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (84.2%).
Setting
| Buller | White Peak | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 63 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 82 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 1.1 km 1.8 km to a named beach | 4.8 km |
NBN connectivity
| Buller | White Peak | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 34/100 | 29/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 6% 66 premises | 0% 197 premises |
Climate
| Buller | White Peak | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 353 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Buller | White Peak | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Durack same for both | |
| Member | Melissa Price same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Buller | White Peak | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $800,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Buller
Other comparisons with White Peak
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.