Bukali vs Monto
Bukali is the younger of the two, with a median age of 46 against 55 in Monto. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Bukali, most households are couple families. In Monto, most households are people living alone. On these figures, Bukali tends to suit couples, while Monto suits people living alone and older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Monto
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (7 vs 0)
- has more schools inside the suburb (3 vs 0)
- But Bukali is already more of a family suburb (56% vs 35%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Monto
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (22% vs 33%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
Monto
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (338 min vs 344 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (478.7 km vs 485.7 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Monto
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more residents already 65 and over (34% vs 19%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Monto
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (-2.8% vs -9.5%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Bukali and Monto drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Monto has more residents (1,156 vs 57); Bukali has higher household incomes ($58,500 vs $44,356).
| Bukali | Monto | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 57 | 1,156 +1928% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -9.5% | -2.8% |
| Median age | 46 | 55 |
| Median household income | $58,500/yr +24% vs other | $44,356/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $180/wk +6% vs other | $170/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (26.3%).
Property market
| Bukali | Monto | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $315,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $96,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 49 days from 19 sales |
Development activity
| Bukali | Monto | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 30 across North Burnett same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -33% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Bukali | Monto | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 22% of QLD | Higher than 7% of QLD |
| Schools | — | Higher than 67% of QLD |
| Walkability | Higher than 18% of QLD | Higher than 67% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | — same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 31% of QLD | Higher than 80% of QLD |
Liveability
| Bukali | Monto | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | D |
| Score | — | 29/100 |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 2/10 | high-need area decile 1/10 |
Risk profile
Monto carries more bushfire risk (43 vs 0).
| Bukali | Monto | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Moderate 43/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 57/100 | Moderate 63/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Bukali | Monto | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 3 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
Schools in Bukali
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Monto
- Monto State School Government · Primary above peers
- Monto State High School Government · Secondary at peers
- St Therese's Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Bukali | Monto | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 2 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 7 |
| Childcare | 0 | 1 |
| GPs | 0 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 2 |
| Hospitals | 0 | 1 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 3 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 2 |
| EV chargers | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 1 | 7 |
Mobility
Bukali sits further from the CBD (485.7 km vs 478.7 km).
| Bukali | Monto | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 4/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 485.7 km +1% vs other | 478.7 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 344 min | 338 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.0% postcode 4630 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 44 postcode 4630 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (71.4%).
Setting
| Bukali | Monto | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 288 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 235 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Bukali | Monto | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 24/100 | 71/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 19 premises | 43% 878 premises |
Climate
| Bukali | Monto | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 721 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 32.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.6°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Bukali | Monto | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,183/yr same for both | |
| Council | North Burnett same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Bukali | Monto | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Flynn same for both | |
| Member | Colin Boyce same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Bukali | Monto | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Bukali
Monto
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Bukali
Other comparisons with Monto
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.