Buderim vs Sippy Downs
Sippy Downs is the younger of the two, with a median age of 33 against 46 in Buderim. In both, most households own their home and most homes are detached houses. Houses cost more in Buderim: a median of $1.38 million, against $1.05 million in Sippy Downs. On these figures, Sippy Downs tends to suit buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Buderim
ahead on 4 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (65 vs 7)
- has more schools rated above their peers (2 vs 0)
- has more childcare (15 vs 8)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Sippy Downs
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper houses ($1,050,000 vs $1,375,000)
- has cheaper units ($690,517 vs $810,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Buderim leaves renters under less rental stress (26% vs 31%)
- Sippy Downs has a bigger rental market to choose from (39% vs 22%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Sippy Downs
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (74 min vs 80 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (92 km vs 94 km)
- But Buderim is more walkable (69/100 vs 17/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Buderim
ahead on 4 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (69/100 vs 17/100)
- has more GPs (11 vs 5)
- carries lower crime risk (28/100 vs 49/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Sippy Downs
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is growing faster (12.1% vs 7.1%)
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (3.9% vs 3.2%)
- returns a higher gross yield on units (4.7% vs 4.2%)
Weighs house yield, unit yield, and population growth.
Where they sit
Buderim and Sippy Downs drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Buderim has more residents (31,430 vs 11,544); Buderim skews older (46 vs 33).
| Buderim | Sippy Downs | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,430 +63% vs other | 11,544 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +7.1% | +12.1% |
| Median age | 46 | 33 |
| Median household income | $89,908/yr +14% vs other | $77,168/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $450/wk | $460/wk +2% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (13.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.1%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (7.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Buderim | Sippy Downs | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,375,000 | $1,050,000 |
| Median unit price | $810,000 | $690,517 |
| Median land price | $1,087,500 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 28 days from 368 sales | 23 days from 98 sales |
Unit price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
76 vs 45 sales
81 vs 20 sales
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
180 vs 35 sales
350 vs 168 sales
102 vs 14 sales
Development activity
| Buderim | Sippy Downs | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 2,962 across Sunshine Coast same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -41% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Buderim | Sippy Downs | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.2% $900/wk on $1.45M | 3.9% $822/wk on $1.1M |
| Units | 4.2% $645/wk on $805K | 4.7% $695/wk on $775K |
Ranking within QLD
| Buderim | Sippy Downs | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 63% of QLD | Higher than 48% of QLD |
| Schools | Higher than 95% of QLD | Higher than 10% of QLD |
| Walkability | Higher than 92% of QLD | Higher than 77% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 88% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 78% of QLD | Higher than 79% of QLD |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 15% of QLD | Higher than 47% of QLD |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 37% of QLD | Higher than 60% of QLD |
Liveability
Buderim is more walkable (69 vs 17); Buderim scores higher overall (73 vs 33).
| Buderim | Sippy Downs | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A | D |
| Score | 73/100 | 33/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 |
Risk profile
Sippy Downs carries more crime risk (49 vs 28); Sippy Downs carries more bushfire risk (63 vs 38).
| Buderim | Sippy Downs | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 38/100 | Moderate 63/100 |
| Crime | Low 28/100 | Moderate 49/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Buderim | Sippy Downs | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 3 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 2 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 3 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 UniSC Sunshine Coast, 4.4 km | 1 UniSC Sunshine Coast, 0.0 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 1.8% | 7.2% |
Schools in Buderim
- Buderim Mountain State School Government · Primary above peers
- Matthew Flinders Anglican College Independent · Combined above peers
- Immanuel Lutheran College Independent · Combined at peers
Schools in Sippy Downs
- Chancellor State College Government · Combined at peers
- Siena Catholic College Catholic · Secondary at peers
- Siena Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Buderim | Sippy Downs | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 6 | 3 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 12 | 9 |
| Parks & reserves | 65 | 7 |
| Childcare | 15 | 8 |
| GPs | 11 | 5 |
| Pharmacies | 6 | 3 |
| Hospitals | 1 | 0 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 4 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 2 |
| EV chargers | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 50 | 18 |
Mobility
Buderim sits further from the CBD (94 km vs 92 km).
| Buderim | Sippy Downs | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 69/100 | 17/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 94 km +2% vs other | 92 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 80 min | 74 min |
| Public transport score | 76/100 Bus | 78/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 125.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 98.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual | 1 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.3% postcode 4556 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 73 postcode 4556 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (78.1%).
Setting
| Buderim | Sippy Downs | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 119 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 1 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 4.7 km 4.9 km to a named beach | 5.4 km |
NBN connectivity
| Buderim | Sippy Downs | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 68/100 | 70/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 42% 14,677 premises | 46% 4,718 premises |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Buderim | Sippy Downs | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.31 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Buderim | Sippy Downs | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,690/yr same for both | |
| Council | Sunshine Coast same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Buderim | Sippy Downs | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Fairfax | Fisher |
| Member | Ted O'Brien | Andrew Wallace |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Buderim | Sippy Downs | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Buderim
Sippy Downs
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Buderim
Other comparisons with Sippy Downs
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.