Bucca vs Sapphire Beach
Bucca is the younger of the two, with a median age of 43 against 46 in Sapphire Beach. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Sapphire Beach tends to suit people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Bucca is already more of a family suburb (73% vs 64%)
- Sapphire Beach carries lower crime risk (48/100 vs 58/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Bucca
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($400/wk vs $475/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Sapphire Beach
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (355 min vs 362 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (536.8 km vs 547.3 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Sapphire Beach
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more residents already 65 and over (22% vs 16%)
- carries lower crime risk (48/100 vs 58/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Sapphire Beach
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (27.6% vs 11.0%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Bucca and Sapphire Beach drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Sapphire Beach has more residents (2,660 vs 614); Sapphire Beach rents higher ($475/wk vs $400/wk).
| Bucca | Sapphire Beach | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 614 | 2,660 +333% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +11.0% | +27.6% |
| Median age | 43 | 46 |
| Median household income | $90,480/yr | $106,912/yr +18% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $400/wk | $475/wk +19% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.1%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.2%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Bucca | Sapphire Beach | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,135,000 | $1,190,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $603,500 |
| Median land price | — | $734,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 36 days from 33 sales |
Zoning mix
Bucca has more rural and farming land (92% vs 67%).
| Bucca | Sapphire Beach | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 92% | 67% |
| Residential | 0% | 16% |
| Environmental | 8% | 10% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 0% | 5% |
| Parks and recreation | 0% | 1% |
| Planning zones cover 100% of Bucca and 99% of Sapphire Beach. The rest is unzoned land such as water or road reserve. | ||
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Bucca | Sapphire Beach | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 356 across Coffs Harbour same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +61% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Bucca | Sapphire Beach | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 2.7% $750/wk on $1.43M |
| Units | — | 5.7% $550/wk on $500K |
Ranking within NSW
| Bucca | Sapphire Beach | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 76% of NSW | Higher than 62% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 58% of NSW | Higher than 73% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 56% of NSW | Higher than 58% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 26% of NSW | Higher than 56% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 55% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 38% of NSW | Higher than 95% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 12% of NSW |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 90% of NSW |
Liveability
Sapphire Beach scores higher overall (44 vs 27).
| Bucca | Sapphire Beach | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | D | C |
| Score | 27/100 | 44/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 | very advantaged area decile 9/10 |
Risk profile
Bucca carries more bushfire risk (53 vs 43); Bucca carries more crime risk (58 vs 48).
| Bucca | Sapphire Beach | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 53/100 | Moderate 43/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 58/100 | Moderate 48/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 | Moderate 42/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Bucca | Sapphire Beach | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Bucca | Sapphire Beach | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 same for both | |
| Childcare | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 6 | 5 |
Mobility
Bucca sits further from the CBD (547.3 km vs 536.8 km).
| Bucca | Sapphire Beach | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 10/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Sydney | 547.3 km +2% vs other | 536.8 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 362 min | 355 min |
| Public transport score | 23/100 Bus | 36/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 6.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 11.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.5% postcode 2450 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 52 postcode 2450 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (78.1%).
Setting
| Bucca | Sapphire Beach | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 93 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 67 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 8.2 km | 1.6 km 2.3 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Bucca | Sapphire Beach | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 27/100 | 91/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 185 premises | 88% 1,307 premises |
Climate
| Bucca | Sapphire Beach | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,827 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Bucca | Sapphire Beach | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 4.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 10.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.22 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Bucca | Sapphire Beach | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,437/yr same for both | |
| Council | Coffs Harbour same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Bucca | Sapphire Beach | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Page same for both | |
| Member | Kevin Hogan same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Bucca | Sapphire Beach | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Bucca
Other comparisons with Sapphire Beach
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.