Bucasia vs Shoal Point
Bucasia is the younger of the two, with a median age of 35 against 42 in Shoal Point. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Bucasia, about half of households are couple families. In Shoal Point, most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Shoal Point: a median of $785,000, against $685,000 in Bucasia.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Too close to call
Nothing among the 6 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Bucasia
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- has cheaper units ($209,500 vs $610,000)
- has cheaper land ($680,000 vs $850,000)
- has cheaper houses ($685,000 vs $785,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Bucasia
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (33% vs 20%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Bucasia
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (38/100 vs 6/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (979.2 km vs 981.9 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Bucasia
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (38/100 vs 6/100)
- has more GPs (2 vs 0)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Bucasia returns a higher gross yield on houses (5.3% vs 4.2%)
- Shoal Point is growing faster (13.0% vs 3.0%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Bucasia and Shoal Point drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Bucasia has more residents (4,915 vs 1,104); Shoal Point has higher household incomes ($126,568 vs $104,260).
| Bucasia | Shoal Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,915 +78% vs other | 1,104 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +3.0% | +13.0% |
| Median age | 35 | 42 |
| Median household income | $104,260/yr | $126,568/yr +21% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $380/wk same for both | |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.1%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.1%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Bucasia | Shoal Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $685,000 | $785,000 |
| Median unit price | $209,500 | $610,000 |
| Median land price | $680,000 | $850,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 28 days from 62 sales | 24 days from 12 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
75 vs 12 sales
97 vs 21 sales
Development activity
| Bucasia | Shoal Point | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 574 across Mackay same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -6% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Bucasia | Shoal Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 5.3% $710/wk on $700K | 4.2% $788/wk on $972K |
| Units | 14.5% $600/wk on $215K | — |
Ranking within QLD
| Bucasia | Shoal Point | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 77% of QLD | Higher than 92% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 84% of QLD | Higher than 69% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 46% of QLD | Higher than 47% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 80% of QLD | Higher than 86% of QLD |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 95% of QLD | Higher than 65% of QLD |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 100% of QLD | — |
Liveability
Bucasia is more walkable (38 vs 6); Shoal Point scores higher overall (57 vs 51).
| Bucasia | Shoal Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 51/100 | 57/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 | advantaged area decile 8/10 |
Risk profile
| Bucasia | Shoal Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 53/100 same for both | |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 | High 93/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Bucasia | Shoal Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
Schools in Bucasia
- Bucasia State School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Shoal Point
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Bucasia | Shoal Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 7 | 6 |
| Childcare | 2 | 0 |
| GPs | 2 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 0 |
| Beaches | 1 same for both | |
Mobility
Shoal Point sits further from the CBD (981.9 km vs 979.2 km).
| Bucasia | Shoal Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 38/100 | 6/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 979.2 km | 981.9 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 679 min | 680 min |
| Public transport score | 44/100 Bus | 24/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 15.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 3.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 1.5 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.3% postcode 4750 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 67 postcode 4750 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (87.7%).
Setting
| Bucasia | Shoal Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | -1 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 3 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 1.5 km 1.6 km to a named beach | 996 m 1.8 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Bucasia | Shoal Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 72/100 | 75/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 49% 2,031 premises | 55% 573 premises |
Climate
| Bucasia | Shoal Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,633 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.6°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 14.5°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Bucasia | Shoal Point | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.6 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.9 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Bucasia | Shoal Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,873/yr same for both | |
| Council | Mackay same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Bucasia | Shoal Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Dawson same for both | |
| Member | Andrew Willcox same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Bucasia | Shoal Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Bucasia
Other comparisons with Shoal Point
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.