Brunkerville vs Freemans Waterhole
Freemans Waterhole is the younger of the two, with a median age of 39 against 48 in Brunkerville. In Brunkerville, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. In Freemans Waterhole, most households rent, about half of homes are flats or apartments, and about half of households are people living alone. Houses cost more in Brunkerville: a median of $875,000, against $435,000 in Freemans Waterhole, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Brunkerville tends to suit couples and older residents, while Freemans Waterhole suits renters, people living alone, and families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Brunkerville
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (22/100 vs 98/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (85% vs 44%)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (100% vs 52%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Brunkerville leaves households under less mortgage stress (20% vs 101%)
- Freemans Waterhole has cheaper houses ($435,000 vs $875,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Freemans Waterhole
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (71% vs 12%)
- has cheaper rent ($220/wk vs $350/wk)
- But Brunkerville leaves renters under less rental stress (16% vs 36%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Freemans Waterhole
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (95 min vs 105 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (128.4 km vs 134 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Brunkerville
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (22/100 vs 98/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (26% vs 12%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Freemans Waterhole
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (21.2% vs 5.9%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Brunkerville and Freemans Waterhole drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Brunkerville has higher household incomes ($117,000 vs $32,188); Brunkerville has more residents (216 vs 120).
| Brunkerville | Freemans Waterhole | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 216 +44% vs other | 120 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +5.9% | +21.2% |
| Median age | 48 | 39 |
| Median household income | $117,000/yr +72% vs other | $32,188/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $350/wk +37% vs other | $220/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.1%).
Property market
| Brunkerville | Freemans Waterhole | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $875,000 | $435,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
| Brunkerville | Freemans Waterhole | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 57% | 56% |
| Environmental | 42% | 41% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 1% | 3% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Brunkerville | Freemans Waterhole | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 719 across Cessnock | 1,212 across Lake Macquarie |
| Approvals change year on year | -31% | +2% |
Ranking within NSW
| Brunkerville | Freemans Waterhole | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 41% of NSW | Higher than 12% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 81% of NSW | Higher than 2% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 56% of NSW | Higher than 57% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 82% of NSW | Higher than 41% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 56% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 52% of NSW | Higher than 8% of NSW |
Liveability
| Brunkerville | Freemans Waterhole | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 | below-average income decile 3/10 |
Risk profile
Freemans Waterhole carries more crime risk (98 vs 22).
| Brunkerville | Freemans Waterhole | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 62/100 | Moderate 59/100 |
| Crime | Low 22/100 | High 98/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Brunkerville | Freemans Waterhole | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Brunkerville | Freemans Waterhole | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 2 |
| Waterways | 3 | 7 |
Mobility
Brunkerville sits further from the CBD (134 km vs 128.4 km).
| Brunkerville | Freemans Waterhole | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 10/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Sydney | 134 km +4% vs other | 128.4 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 105 min | 95 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.5% postcode 2323 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 44 postcode 2323 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (64.4%).
Setting
| Brunkerville | Freemans Waterhole | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 88 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 87 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 20.2 km | 17.5 km |
NBN connectivity
| Brunkerville | Freemans Waterhole | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 | 15/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Satellite (Sky Muster) |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 80 premises | 0% 10 premises |
Climate
| Brunkerville | Freemans Waterhole | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 804 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.0°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 5.1°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Brunkerville | Freemans Waterhole | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 11.6 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.27 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Brunkerville | Freemans Waterhole | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,405/yr | $1,708/yr |
| Council | Cessnock | Lake Macquarie |
Federal electorate
| Brunkerville | Freemans Waterhole | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Hunter same for both | |
| Member | Dan Repacholi same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Brunkerville | Freemans Waterhole | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Freemans Waterhole
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Brunkerville
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.