Bruce vs Lawson
In both, about half of households rent. Houses cost more in Bruce: a median of $1.17 million, against $985,000 in Lawson, though rent is higher in Lawson. Bruce is closer to the city centre: 7.3 km, against 10.3 km. On these figures, Bruce tends to suit people living alone, while Lawson suits young adults, share households, and buyers on a tighter budget.
Bruce is a larger, more established suburb with 7520 residents compared to Lawson's 2739, and sits closer to the CBD at 7.3 km versus 10.3 km. Bruce offers better walkability (65 versus 47) and lower crime risk (70 versus 39), though it carries moderate bushfire risk (47) while Lawson has none. Lawson has a higher median household income at $129,584 and significantly lower flood risk, but rental costs are steeper at $548 per week versus $430. For unit investors, Lawson's gross rental yield of 9.2% outpaces Bruce's 6.4%, though Bruce's house market commands higher prices at $1,165,000 median compared to $985,000.
Written by an AI language model from the figures below. Every number in it is checked against those figures before it is published.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Bruce has more childcare (7 vs 0)
- Lawson carries lower crime risk (39/100 vs 70/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Bruce has cheaper units ($417,500 vs $652,500)
- Lawson has cheaper houses ($985,000 vs $1,165,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Bruce
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($430/wk vs $548/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Bruce
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (12 min vs 17 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (7.3 km vs 10.3 km)
- is more walkable (65/100 vs 47/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Bruce
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more GPs (5 vs 0)
- has more residents already 65 and over (11% vs 2%)
- is more walkable (65/100 vs 47/100)
- But Lawson carries lower crime risk (39/100 vs 70/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Lawson
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- is growing faster (1750.7% vs 7.5%)
- returns a higher gross yield on units (8.5% vs 6.3%)
Weighs house yield, unit yield, and population growth.
Where they sit
Bruce and Lawson drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Bruce has more residents (7,520 vs 2,739); Lawson rents higher ($548/wk vs $430/wk).
| Bruce | Lawson | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,520 +64% vs other | 2,739 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +7.5% | +1750.7% |
| Median age | 29 | 28 |
| Median household income | $117,832/yr | $129,584/yr +10% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $430/wk | $548/wk +27% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (37.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (27.7%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (13.8%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Bruce | Lawson | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,165,000 | $985,000 |
| Median unit price | $417,500 | $652,500 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 44 days from 28 sales | 25 days from 7 sales |
Unit price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
83 vs 6 sales
47 vs 19 sales
27 vs 17 sales
Development activity
| Bruce | Lawson | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 3,750 across Unincorporated ACT same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -48% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Bruce | Lawson | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 5.3% $780/wk on $760K | 5.4% $720/wk on $695K |
| Units | 6.3% $500/wk on $412K | 8.5% $700/wk on $429K |
Ranking within ACT
| Bruce | Lawson | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 34% of ACT | Higher than 61% of ACT |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 55% of ACT | Higher than 30% of ACT |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 29% of ACT | Higher than 30% of ACT |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 64% of ACT | Higher than 86% of ACT |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 93% of ACT | Higher than 96% of ACT |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 68% of ACT | Higher than 100% of ACT |
Liveability
Bruce is more walkable (65 vs 47).
| Bruce | Lawson | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 64/100 | 63/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Lawson carries more flood risk (65 vs 0); Bruce carries more bushfire risk (47 vs 0).
| Bruce | Lawson | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 47/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | High 70/100 | Low 39/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 | Moderate 65/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 4 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Bruce | Lawson | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 UC - Canberra, Bruce, 0.0 km | 2 UC - Canberra, Bruce, 2.3 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 14.6% | 8.0% |
Schools in Bruce
- Radford College Independent · Combined
Schools in Lawson
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Bruce | Lawson | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 7 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 same for both | |
| Childcare | 7 | 0 |
| GPs | 5 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 0 |
| Hospitals | 3 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 0 | 5 |
Mobility
Lawson sits further from the CBD (10.3 km vs 7.3 km).
| Bruce | Lawson | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 65/100 | 47/100 |
| Distance to Canberra | 7.3 km | 10.3 km +41% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 12 min | 17 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus | 78/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 356.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 47.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual | 1 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.7% postcode 2617 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 29 postcode 2617 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (75.7%).
Setting
| Bruce | Lawson | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 620 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 588 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Bruce | Lawson | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 67/100 | 100/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the building | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 24% 3,868 premises | 100% 1,088 premises |
Climate
| Bruce | Lawson | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 622 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 0.8°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Bruce | Lawson | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.6 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 11.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.41 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Bruce | Lawson | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $3,105/yr same for both | |
| Council | Unincorporated ACT same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Bruce | Lawson | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Canberra same for both | |
| Member | Alicia Payne same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Bruce | Lawson | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | Not offered same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | None same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Bruce
Other comparisons with Lawson
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.