Broadford vs Sugarloaf Creek
Broadford is the younger of the two, with a median age of 40 against 49 in Sugarloaf Creek. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Sugarloaf Creek, the large majority of households are couple families. On these figures, Broadford tends to suit people living alone, while Sugarloaf Creek suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Broadford
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (14 vs 0)
- has more childcare (3 vs 0)
- has more schools inside the suburb (2 vs 0)
- But Sugarloaf Creek carries lower crime risk (31/100 vs 65/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Sugarloaf Creek
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (9% vs 21%)
- has cheaper rent ($200/wk vs $314/wk)
- But Broadford has a bigger rental market to choose from (19% vs 8%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Broadford
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (68 min vs 79 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (87.4 km vs 96.3 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 5 things we measure here
- Broadford has more GPs (5 vs 0)
- Sugarloaf Creek carries lower crime risk (31/100 vs 65/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Broadford and Sugarloaf Creek drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Broadford has more residents (4,592 vs 255); Broadford rents higher ($314/wk vs $200/wk).
| Broadford | Sugarloaf Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,592 +94% vs other | 255 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +6.3% | +4.5% |
| Median age | 40 | 49 |
| Median household income | $78,988/yr | $113,100/yr +43% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $314/wk +36% vs other | $200/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.0%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (2.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Broadford | Sugarloaf Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $620,000 | — |
| Median unit price | $458,750 | — |
| Median land price | $310,000 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 54 days from 77 sales | — |
Zoning mix
Sugarloaf Creek has more rural and farming land (100% vs 87%).
| Broadford | Sugarloaf Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 87% | 100% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 5% | 0% |
| Residential | 4% | 0% |
| Parks and recreation | 2% | 0% |
| Industrial | 1% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Broadford | Sugarloaf Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,074 across Mitchell same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +70% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Broadford | Sugarloaf Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.1% $550/wk on $698K | — |
| Units | 3.8% $345/wk on $472K | — |
Ranking within VIC
| Broadford | Sugarloaf Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 24% of VIC | — |
| Income | Higher than 46% of VIC | — |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 28% of VIC | Higher than 61% of VIC |
| Affordability | Higher than 76% of VIC | — |
| EV adoption | Higher than 28% of VIC | Higher than 29% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 79% of VIC | Higher than 70% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 74% of VIC | — |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 4% of VIC | — |
Liveability
| Broadford | Sugarloaf Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | D | — |
| Score | 20/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 | advantaged area decile 7/10 |
Risk profile
Broadford carries more crime risk (65 vs 31); Broadford carries more bushfire risk (76 vs 62).
| Broadford | Sugarloaf Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 76/100 | Moderate 62/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 65/100 | Low 31/100 |
| Flood | Low 38/100 | Moderate 46/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 3 within 5 km | 0 within 5 km |
Schools
| Broadford | Sugarloaf Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 2 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 2 | 0 |
Schools in Broadford
- Broadford Primary School Government · Primary below peers
- Broadford Secondary College Government · Secondary below peers
Schools in Sugarloaf Creek
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Broadford | Sugarloaf Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 2 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | 0 |
| Childcare | 3 | 0 |
| GPs | 5 | 0 |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 2 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 0 |
| EV chargers | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 4 | 3 |
Mobility
Sugarloaf Creek sits further from the CBD (96.3 km vs 87.4 km).
| Broadford | Sugarloaf Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Melbourne | 87.4 km | 96.3 km +10% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 68 min | 79 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.3% postcode 3658 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 57 postcode 3658 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (78.2%).
Setting
| Broadford | Sugarloaf Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 226 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 204 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Broadford | Sugarloaf Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 69/100 | 30/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 47% 2,271 premises | 0% 96 premises |
Climate
| Broadford | Sugarloaf Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 540 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Broadford | Sugarloaf Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,947/yr same for both | |
| Council | Mitchell same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Broadford | Sugarloaf Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Nicholls same for both | |
| Member | Sam Birrell same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Broadford | Sugarloaf Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Broadford
Other comparisons with Sugarloaf Creek
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.