Brinkley vs Woods Point
Brinkley is the younger of the two, with a median age of 45 against 51 in Woods Point. In both, most households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and about half of households are people living alone. On these figures, Brinkley tends to suit people living alone, while Woods Point suits couples and older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Woods Point
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (42/100 vs 66/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (55% vs 46%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Woods Point
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (18% vs 27%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Brinkley
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (27% vs 9%)
- has cheaper rent ($205/wk vs $240/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Brinkley sits closer to the CBD (86.2 km vs 88.4 km)
- Woods Point is more walkable (23/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Woods Point
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (23/100 vs 0/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (25% vs 15%)
- carries lower crime risk (42/100 vs 66/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Brinkley
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (21.6% vs 10.6%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Brinkley and Woods Point drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Woods Point has more residents (188 vs 107); Woods Point rents higher ($240/wk vs $205/wk).
| Brinkley | Woods Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 107 | 188 +76% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +21.6% | +10.6% |
| Median age | 45 | 51 |
| Median household income | $68,900/yr | $69,056/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $205/wk | $240/wk +17% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.7%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.6%).
Zoning mix
Woods Point has more land zoned for conservation (27% vs 0%); Brinkley has more rural and farming land (100% vs 73%).
| Brinkley | Woods Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 100% | 73% |
| Environmental | 0% | 27% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Brinkley | Woods Point | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 274 across Murray Bridge same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +51% same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Brinkley | Woods Point | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 38% of SA same for both | |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 38% of SA | Higher than 73% of SA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 32% of SA same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 62% of SA same for both | |
Liveability
Woods Point is more walkable (23 vs 0).
| Brinkley | Woods Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 | below-average income decile 2/10 |
Risk profile
Brinkley carries more crime risk (66 vs 42).
| Brinkley | Woods Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 66/100 | Moderate 42/100 |
| Flood | — same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 3 within 5 km | 0 within 5 km |
Schools
| Brinkley | Woods Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Brinkley | Woods Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 1 |
Mobility
Woods Point sits further from the CBD (88.4 km vs 86.2 km).
| Brinkley | Woods Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 23/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 86.2 km | 88.4 km +3% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 66 min | 64 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.2% postcode 5253 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 66 postcode 5253 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (73.2%).
Setting
| Brinkley | Woods Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 14 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 25 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Brinkley | Woods Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 53 premises | 0% 76 premises |
Climate
| Brinkley | Woods Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 337 mm | 345 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.0°C | — |
| Winter min (Jul) | 5.7°C | — |
Council rates
| Brinkley | Woods Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,478/yr same for both | |
| Council | Murray Bridge same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Brinkley | Woods Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Barker same for both | |
| Member | Tony Pasin same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Brinkley | Woods Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Brinkley
Other comparisons with Woods Point
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.