Bringelly vs Luddenham
Luddenham is the younger of the two, with a median age of 37 against 42 in Bringelly. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. On these figures, Luddenham tends to suit families with children and couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Luddenham
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (4 vs 1)
- is already more of a family suburb (86% vs 75%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Bringelly
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper land ($3,550,000 vs $5,100,000)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Luddenham
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves renters under less rental stress (16% vs 27%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Bringelly
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (14/100 vs 5/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Bringelly
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (14/100 vs 5/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (19% vs 11%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Luddenham
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (5.4% vs -3.0%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Bringelly and Luddenham drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Luddenham has higher household incomes ($154,336 vs $95,316); Bringelly has more residents (2,433 vs 1,927).
| Bringelly | Luddenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,433 +21% vs other | 1,927 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -3.0% | +5.4% |
| Median age | 42 | 37 |
| Median household income | $95,316/yr | $154,336/yr +62% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $500/wk +4% vs other | $480/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.0%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (2.3%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Bringelly | Luddenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2,950,500 | $2,756,444 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $3,550,000 | $5,100,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 120 days from 6 sales | 52 days from 17 sales |
Zoning mix
Bringelly has more rural and farming land (48% vs 24%).
| Bringelly | Luddenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 48% | 24% |
| Other and special use | 12% | 23% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 2% | 21% |
| Commercial | 12% | 17% |
| Residential | 14% | 0% |
| Environmental | 7% | 13% |
| Parks and recreation | 2% same for both | |
| Planning zones cover 99% of Bringelly and 99% of Luddenham. The rest is unzoned land such as water or road reserve. | ||
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Bringelly | Luddenham | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,671 across Camden | 1,063 across Penrith |
| Approvals change year on year | -21% | -78% |
Gross rental yield
| Bringelly | Luddenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 1.2% $750/wk on $3.39M | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Bringelly | Luddenham | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 97% of NSW | Higher than 95% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 63% of NSW | Higher than 95% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 65% of NSW | Higher than 47% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 2% of NSW | Higher than 12% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 62% of NSW | Higher than 80% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 97% of NSW | Higher than 77% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 1% of NSW | — |
Liveability
Bringelly is more walkable (14 vs 5).
| Bringelly | Luddenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C same for both | |
| Score | 42/100 | 41/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | very advantaged area decile 10/10 |
Risk profile
Luddenham carries more bushfire risk (66 vs 30).
| Bringelly | Luddenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 30/100 | Moderate 66/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 69/100 | High 71/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | High 91/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km | 4 within 5 km |
Schools
| Bringelly | Luddenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 2 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 1 same for both | |
Schools in Bringelly
- Bringelly Public School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Luddenham
- Holy Family Primary School Catholic · Primary at peers
- Luddenham Public School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Bringelly | Luddenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 same for both | |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 4 |
| Childcare | 1 | 2 |
| GPs | 1 same for both | |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 same for both | |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 2 |
| Waterways | 6 | 10 |
Mobility
| Bringelly | Luddenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 14/100 | 5/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 57.6 km +1% vs other | 57 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 55 min | 52 min |
| Public transport score | 78/100 Bus | 34/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 50.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 5.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 3.5 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 2556 | 0.9% postcode 2745 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 33 postcode 2556 | 56 postcode 2745 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (57.4%).
Setting
| Bringelly | Luddenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 99 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 67 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 38.3 km | 41.8 km |
NBN connectivity
| Bringelly | Luddenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 95/100 | 70/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 75% 863 premises | 44% 659 premises |
Climate
| Bringelly | Luddenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 817 mm | 822 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.4°C | — |
| Winter min (Jul) | 4.2°C | — |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Bringelly | Luddenham | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.7 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 16.9 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.37 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Bringelly | Luddenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,504/yr | $1,547/yr |
| Council | Camden | Penrith |
Federal electorate
| Bringelly | Luddenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Hume | Lindsay |
| Member | Angus Taylor | Melissa Mcintosh |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Bringelly | Luddenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Bringelly
Other comparisons with Luddenham
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.