Bringelly vs Catherine Field
Catherine Field is the younger of the two, with a median age of 33 against 42 in Bringelly. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Bringelly: a median of $2.95 million, against $1.26 million in Catherine Field. On these figures, Catherine Field tends to suit families with children and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Catherine Field
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (45/100 vs 69/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Catherine Field
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($1,260,000 vs $2,950,500)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Catherine Field
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (34/100 vs 14/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Catherine Field
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (34/100 vs 14/100)
- carries lower crime risk (45/100 vs 69/100)
- But Bringelly has more residents already 65 and over (19% vs 12%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Catherine Field
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- is growing faster (57.5% vs -3.0%)
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (3.3% vs 1.2%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Bringelly and Catherine Field drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Bringelly skews older (42 vs 33); Catherine Field has higher household incomes ($120,432 vs $95,316).
| Bringelly | Catherine Field | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,433 | 2,609 +7% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -3.0% | +57.5% |
| Median age | 42 | 33 |
| Median household income | $95,316/yr | $120,432/yr +26% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $500/wk | $520/wk +4% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.0%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.5%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Bringelly | Catherine Field | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2,950,500 | $1,260,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $3,550,000 | $4,050,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 120 days from 6 sales | 35 days from 67 sales |
Zoning mix
Catherine Field has more rural and farming land (72% vs 48%); Bringelly has more commercially zoned land (12% vs 0%).
| Bringelly | Catherine Field | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 48% | 72% |
| Residential | 14% | 23% |
| Other and special use | 12% | 0% |
| Commercial | 12% | 0% |
| Environmental | 7% | 3% |
| Parks and recreation | 2% | 0% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 2% same for both | |
| Planning zones cover 99% of Bringelly and 100% of Catherine Field. The rest is unzoned land such as water or road reserve. | ||
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Bringelly | Catherine Field | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,671 across Camden same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -21% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Bringelly | Catherine Field | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 1.2% $750/wk on $3.39M | 3.3% $785/wk on $1.22M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Bringelly | Catherine Field | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 97% of NSW | Higher than 60% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 63% of NSW | Higher than 84% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 65% of NSW | Higher than 77% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 2% of NSW | Higher than 68% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 62% of NSW | Higher than 91% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 97% of NSW | Higher than 98% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 1% of NSW | Higher than 36% of NSW |
Liveability
Catherine Field is more walkable (34 vs 14); Catherine Field scores higher overall (59 vs 42).
| Bringelly | Catherine Field | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | B |
| Score | 42/100 | 59/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | advantaged area decile 8/10 |
Risk profile
Bringelly carries more bushfire risk (30 vs 16); Bringelly carries more crime risk (69 vs 45).
| Bringelly | Catherine Field | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 30/100 | Low 16/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 69/100 | Moderate 45/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | High 91/100 | None 0/100 |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km | 0 within 5 km |
Schools
| Bringelly | Catherine Field | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
| Universities within 10 km | None | 1 Western Sydney University - Campbelltown, 9.4 km |
Schools in Bringelly
- Bringelly Public School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Catherine Field
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Bringelly | Catherine Field | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 3 |
| Childcare | 1 | 2 |
| GPs | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 6 | 0 |
Mobility
| Bringelly | Catherine Field | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 14/100 | 34/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 57.6 km +3% vs other | 56.1 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 55 min | 53 min |
| Public transport score | 78/100 Bus | 79/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 50.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 52.5 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 2556 | 1.7% postcode 2557 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 33 postcode 2556 | 69 postcode 2557 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (57.7%).
Setting
| Bringelly | Catherine Field | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 99 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 95 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 38.3 km | 33.3 km |
NBN connectivity
| Bringelly | Catherine Field | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 95/100 | 99/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 75% 863 premises | 93% 1,677 premises |
Climate
| Bringelly | Catherine Field | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 817 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.4°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 4.2°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Bringelly | Catherine Field | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.7 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 16.9 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.37 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Bringelly | Catherine Field | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,504/yr same for both | |
| Council | Camden same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Bringelly | Catherine Field | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Hume same for both | |
| Member | Angus Taylor same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Bringelly | Catherine Field | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Bringelly
Other comparisons with Catherine Field
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.