Branxholme vs Condah
Condah is the younger of the two, with a median age of 46 against 50 in Branxholme. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Branxholme, about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Branxholme tends to suit older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Branxholme
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (28/100 vs 44/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Condah
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (14% vs 20%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Branxholme has cheaper rent ($170/wk vs $206/wk)
- Condah has a bigger rental market to choose from (29% vs 13%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Branxholme
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (13/100 vs 0/100)
- has a shorter drive in (232 min vs 244 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (335.2 km vs 352.1 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Branxholme
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (13/100 vs 0/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (21% vs 12%)
- carries lower crime risk (28/100 vs 44/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Branxholme and Condah drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Branxholme has more residents (304 vs 104); Condah rents higher ($206/wk vs $170/wk).
| Branxholme | Condah | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 304 +66% vs other | 104 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -13.4% | -14.0% |
| Median age | 50 | 46 |
| Median household income | $70,824/yr | $84,500/yr +19% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $170/wk | $206/wk +21% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (2.9%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.1%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Branxholme | Condah | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $450,000 | — |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $115,000 | — |
Zoning mix
| Branxholme | Condah | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 99% | 98% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 1% same for both | |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Branxholme | Condah | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 43 across Southern Grampians | 60 across Glenelg |
| Approvals change year on year | +200% | -65% |
Ranking within VIC
| Branxholme | Condah | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 33% of VIC | Higher than 54% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 75% of VIC | Higher than 41% of VIC |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | — same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 36% of VIC same for both | |
Liveability
Branxholme is more walkable (13 vs 0).
| Branxholme | Condah | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 |
Risk profile
Branxholme carries more flood risk (29 vs 0); Condah carries more crime risk (44 vs 28).
| Branxholme | Condah | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 82/100 | High 88/100 |
| Crime | Low 28/100 | Moderate 44/100 |
| Flood | Low 29/100 | None 0/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Branxholme | Condah | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
Schools in Branxholme
- Branxholme-Wallacedale Community School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Condah
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Branxholme | Condah | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 3 same for both | |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 9 | 2 |
Mobility
Condah sits further from the CBD (352.1 km vs 335.2 km).
| Branxholme | Condah | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 13/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 335.2 km | 352.1 km +5% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 232 min | 244 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.0% postcode 3302 | 0.0% postcode 3303 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 30 postcode 3302 | 31 postcode 3303 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (63.4%).
Setting
| Branxholme | Condah | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 113 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 131 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 45.4 km | 34.4 km |
NBN connectivity
| Branxholme | Condah | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 28/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 177 premises | 0% 65 premises |
Climate
| Branxholme | Condah | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 604 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 26.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 4.7°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Branxholme | Condah | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,892/yr | $1,852/yr |
| Council | Southern Grampians | Glenelg |
Federal electorate
| Branxholme | Condah | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Wannon same for both | |
| Member | Dan Tehan same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Branxholme | Condah | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Branxholme
Other comparisons with Condah
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.