Bowmans vs Port Wakefield
Port Wakefield is the younger of the two, with a median age of 44 against 52 in Bowmans. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Bowmans, the large majority of households are couple families. In Port Wakefield, about half of households are people living alone. On these figures, Bowmans tends to suit couples, while Port Wakefield suits people living alone.
Bowmans is a very small rural community of 56 people, while Port Wakefield is a larger town of 661 residents. Port Wakefield offers better walkability (32 versus 0) and is closer to Adelaide's CBD at 99.8 km compared to Bowmans at 113 km. Bowmans has an older population (median age 52 versus 44) and lower crime risk, though it carries no bushfire risk and slightly lower median household income. Port Wakefield suits someone seeking more amenities and town services, while Bowmans appeals to those prioritising isolation and minimal development.
Written by an AI language model from the figures below. Every number in it is checked against those figures before it is published.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Bowmans
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- is already more of a family suburb (75% vs 41%)
- carries lower crime risk (85/100 vs 95/100)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (100% vs 90%)
- But Port Wakefield has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Port Wakefield
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (21% vs 27%)
- has cheaper rent ($225/wk vs $280/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Port Wakefield
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (35/100 vs 0/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (99.8 km vs 113 km)
- has a shorter drive in (70 min vs 79 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Bowmans
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- has more residents already 65 and over (28% vs 21%)
- carries lower crime risk (85/100 vs 95/100)
- But Port Wakefield is more walkable (35/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Port Wakefield
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (3.9% vs -3.4%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Bowmans and Port Wakefield drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Port Wakefield has more residents (661 vs 56); Bowmans rents higher ($280/wk vs $225/wk).
| Bowmans | Port Wakefield | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 56 | 661 +1080% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -3.4% | +3.9% |
| Median age | 52 | 44 |
| Median household income | $54,184/yr | $56,836/yr +5% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $280/wk +20% vs other | $225/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (14.7%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (10.7%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Bowmans | Port Wakefield | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $410,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $81,000 |
| Median land price | — | $87,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 62 days from 6 sales |
Zoning mix
Port Wakefield has more land zoned for conservation (22% vs 0%); Bowmans has more industrially zoned land (13% vs 0%).
| Bowmans | Port Wakefield | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 87% | 76% |
| Environmental | 0% | 22% |
| Industrial | 13% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Bowmans | Port Wakefield | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 15 across Wakefield same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +0% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Bowmans | Port Wakefield | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 3.3% $372/wk on $590K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Bowmans | Port Wakefield | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 19% of SA | Higher than 22% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 24% of SA | Higher than 76% of SA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 54% of SA | Higher than 55% of SA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 35% of SA | Higher than 63% of SA |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 24% of SA |
Liveability
Port Wakefield is more walkable (35 vs 0).
| Bowmans | Port Wakefield | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | D |
| Score | — | 10/100 |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 2/10 | high-need area decile 1/10 |
Risk profile
Port Wakefield carries more bushfire risk (30 vs 0); Port Wakefield carries more crime risk (95 vs 85).
| Bowmans | Port Wakefield | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Low 30/100 |
| Crime | High 85/100 | High 95/100 |
| Flood | — same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 | High 77/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Bowmans | Port Wakefield | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Bowmans
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Port Wakefield
- Port Wakefield Primary School Government · Primary above peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Bowmans | Port Wakefield | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 1 |
| Childcare | 0 | 1 |
| GPs | 0 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 1 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 3 |
| Beaches | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 4 | 6 |
Mobility
Bowmans sits further from the CBD (113 km vs 99.8 km).
| Bowmans | Port Wakefield | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 35/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 113 km +12% vs other | 99.8 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 79 min | 70 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.5% postcode 5550 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 51 postcode 5550 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (75.2%).
Setting
| Bowmans | Port Wakefield | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 33 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 5 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 12.3 km | 885 m |
NBN connectivity
| Bowmans | Port Wakefield | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 24/100 | 30/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 33 premises | 0% 355 premises |
Climate
| Bowmans | Port Wakefield | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 295 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 27.8°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 7.2°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Bowmans | Port Wakefield | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,640/yr same for both | |
| Council | Wakefield same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Bowmans | Port Wakefield | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Grey same for both | |
| Member | Tom Venning same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Bowmans | Port Wakefield | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Bowmans
Other comparisons with Port Wakefield
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.