Bournda vs Frogs Hollow
Frogs Hollow is the younger of the two, with a median age of 40 against 45 in Bournda. In both, most households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. On these figures, Frogs Hollow tends to suit families with children and couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Frogs Hollow
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (10/100 vs 74/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Bournda
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (24% vs 39%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Bournda
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (26% vs 9%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Frogs Hollow
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (13/100 vs 0/100)
- has a shorter drive in (348 min vs 368 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (506 km vs 530.8 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Frogs Hollow
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (13/100 vs 0/100)
- carries lower crime risk (10/100 vs 74/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (18% vs 13%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Frogs Hollow
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (3.5% vs -16.4%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Bournda and Frogs Hollow drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Bournda skews older (45 vs 40); Bournda has higher household incomes ($74,724 vs $67,184).
| Bournda | Frogs Hollow | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 127 +8% vs other | 117 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -16.4% | +3.5% |
| Median age | 45 | 40 |
| Median household income | $74,724/yr +10% vs other | $67,184/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $270/wk | $290/wk +7% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.5%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.7%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Bournda | Frogs Hollow | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $1,275,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $18,164 |
Zoning mix
Bournda has more land zoned for conservation (95% vs 3%); Frogs Hollow has more rural and farming land (95% vs 5%).
| Bournda | Frogs Hollow | |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental | 95% | 3% |
| Rural and farming | 5% | 95% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 0% | 2% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Bournda | Frogs Hollow | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 109 across Bega Valley same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -32% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Bournda | Frogs Hollow | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — | Higher than 66% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 42% of NSW | Higher than 30% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 13% of NSW | Higher than 61% of NSW |
| Affordability | — | Higher than 19% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 54% of NSW | Higher than 69% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 45% of NSW | Higher than 52% of NSW |
Liveability
Frogs Hollow is more walkable (13 vs 0).
| Bournda | Frogs Hollow | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | advantaged area decile 7/10 |
Risk profile
Bournda carries more crime risk (74 vs 10); Bournda carries more bushfire risk (53 vs 40).
| Bournda | Frogs Hollow | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 53/100 | Moderate 40/100 |
| Crime | High 74/100 | Low 10/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | Moderate 58/100 | None 0/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 2 within 5 km |
Schools
| Bournda | Frogs Hollow | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Bournda | Frogs Hollow | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 0 |
| Waterways | 6 | 4 |
Mobility
Bournda sits further from the CBD (530.8 km vs 506 km).
| Bournda | Frogs Hollow | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 13/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 530.8 km +5% vs other | 506 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 368 min | 348 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.5% postcode 2548 | 0.7% postcode 2550 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 40 postcode 2548 | 61 postcode 2550 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (85.4%).
Setting
| Bournda | Frogs Hollow | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 166 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 105 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 4.9 km | 12.2 km |
NBN connectivity
| Bournda | Frogs Hollow | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 29/100 | 30/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 15% 48 premises | 0% 43 premises |
Climate
| Bournda | Frogs Hollow | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 768 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Bournda | Frogs Hollow | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,767/yr same for both | |
| Council | Bega Valley same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Bournda | Frogs Hollow | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Eden-monaro same for both | |
| Member | Kristy Mcbain same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Bournda | Frogs Hollow | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Bournda
Other comparisons with Frogs Hollow
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.