Bossley Park vs Edensor Park
Comparing Bossley Park and Edensor Park, NSW: Bossley Park has more residents (15,492 vs 10,279); Edensor Park is more walkable (80 vs 68); and Edensor Park has higher household incomes ($94,484 vs $80,184).
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Bossley Park
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (17 vs 6)
- has more schools rated above their peers (2 vs 1)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Edensor Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves renters under less rental stress (25% vs 30%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Edensor Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (80/100 vs 68/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Edensor Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (80/100 vs 68/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Bossley Park and Edensor Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Bossley Park has more residents (15,492 vs 10,279); Edensor Park has higher household incomes ($94,484 vs $80,184).
| Bossley Park | Edensor Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 15,492 +34% vs other | 10,279 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +6.2% | +5.2% |
| Median age | 41 | 39 |
| Median household income | $80,184/yr | $94,484/yr +18% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $465/wk +3% vs other | $450/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (14.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (10.4%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Bossley Park | Edensor Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,410,001 | $1,450,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $800,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 24 days from 70 sales | 28 days from 31 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
55 vs 20 sales
49 vs 13 sales
28 vs 22 sales
Zoning mix
| Bossley Park | Edensor Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 82% same for both | |
| Parks and recreation | 7% | 8% |
| Environmental | 6% same for both | |
| Infrastructure and transport | 4% | 2% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Bossley Park | Edensor Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,095 across Fairfield same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +29% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Bossley Park | Edensor Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 2.7% $750/wk on $1.42M | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Bossley Park | Edensor Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 70% of NSW | Higher than 73% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 47% of NSW | Higher than 62% of NSW |
| Schools | Higher than 87% of NSW | — |
| Walkability | Higher than 88% of NSW | Higher than 92% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 26% of NSW | Higher than 31% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 63% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 86% of NSW | Higher than 82% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 12% of NSW | — |
Liveability
Edensor Park is more walkable (80 vs 68).
| Bossley Park | Edensor Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 68/100 | 65/100 |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
| Bossley Park | Edensor Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 29/100 | Low 31/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 16 within 5 km | 5 within 5 km |
Schools
| Bossley Park | Edensor Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 4 | 2 |
| Rated above peers | 2 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 1 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 50 Scott Street Liverpool, 7.5 km | 1 50 Scott Street Liverpool, 6.0 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 2.7% | 3.2% |
Schools in Bossley Park
- Bossley Park Public School Government · Primary above peers
- Mary Immaculate Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary above peers
- Bossley Park High School Government · Secondary at peers
- Prairievale Public School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Edensor Park
- Edensor Park Public School Government · Primary above peers
- Governor Philip King Public School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Bossley Park | Edensor Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 4 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 17 | 6 |
| Childcare | 8 | 7 |
| GPs | 2 same for both | |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 2 |
| Waterways | 0 | 15 |
Mobility
| Bossley Park | Edensor Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 68/100 | 80/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 37.6 km | 38.5 km +2% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 43 min same for both | |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 355.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 250.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 2176 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 44 postcode 2176 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (58.4%).
Setting
| Bossley Park | Edensor Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 54 m above sea level, at the suburb centre same for both | |
| Distance to the ocean | 27.5 km | 27.1 km |
NBN connectivity
| Bossley Park | Edensor Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 76/100 | 75/100 |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 9% 4,654 premises | 0% 3,056 premises |
Climate
| Bossley Park | Edensor Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 931 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.9°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.9°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Bossley Park | Edensor Park | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 18.2 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.72 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Bossley Park | Edensor Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $990/yr same for both | |
| Council | Fairfield same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Bossley Park | Edensor Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Fowler same for both | |
| Member | Dai Le same for both | |
| Party | Independent same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Bossley Park | Edensor Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Bossley Park
Edensor Park
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Bossley Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.