Boscabel vs Mokup
Boscabel is the younger of the two, with a median age of 50 against 58 in Mokup. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Boscabel, about half of households are people living alone. In Mokup, most households are people living alone. On these figures, Mokup tends to suit people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Boscabel is already more of a family suburb (55% vs 33%)
- Mokup carries lower crime risk (11/100 vs 28/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
Renters
Mokup
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($0/wk vs $70/wk)
Weighs rent.
Commuting to the city
Boscabel
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has a shorter drive in (179 min vs 202 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Mokup
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (11/100 vs 28/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (39% vs 32%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Mokup
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (17.0% vs 10.9%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Boscabel and Mokup drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Boscabel rents higher ($70/wk vs $0/wk); Boscabel has higher household incomes ($71,500 vs $58,448).
| Boscabel | Mokup | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 71 +13% vs other | 62 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +10.9% | +17.0% |
| Median age | 50 | 58 |
| Median household income | $71,500/yr +18% vs other | $58,448/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $70/wk (not reported on the other side) | — |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (29.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (14.1%).
Development activity
| Boscabel | Mokup | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 3 across Kojonup | 3 across West Arthur |
Ranking within WA
| Boscabel | Mokup | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 33% of WA | Higher than 15% of WA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 64% of WA | Higher than 52% of WA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | — same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 40% of WA | Higher than 30% of WA |
Liveability
| Boscabel | Mokup | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 | advantaged area decile 7/10 |
Risk profile
Boscabel carries more crime risk (28 vs 11).
| Boscabel | Mokup | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 28/100 | Low 11/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km | 0 within 5 km |
Schools
| Boscabel | Mokup | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Boscabel | Mokup | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 2 |
| Waterways | 0 | 1 |
Mobility
| Boscabel | Mokup | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Perth | 245 km | 244.2 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 179 min | 202 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.0% postcode 6394 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 17 postcode 6394 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (57.9%).
Setting
| Boscabel | Mokup | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 254 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 231 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Boscabel | Mokup | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 17/100 | 15/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 14 premises | 0% 24 premises |
Climate
| Boscabel | Mokup | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 495 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Boscabel | Mokup | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | O'connor same for both | |
| Member | Rick Wilson same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Boscabel | Mokup | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $800,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Boscabel
Other comparisons with Mokup
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.