Booker Bay vs Wagstaffe
Booker Bay is the younger of the two, with a median age of 54 against 60 in Wagstaffe. In both, most households own their home. In Booker Bay, about half of households are people living alone. In Wagstaffe, the large majority of homes are detached houses and most households are people living alone. Houses cost more in Wagstaffe: a median of $2.01 million, against $1.61 million in Booker Bay. On these figures, Booker Bay tends to suit buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Wagstaffe
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more separate houses rather than flats (98% vs 52%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Booker Bay has cheaper houses ($1,610,000 vs $2,013,000)
- Wagstaffe leaves households under less mortgage stress (26% vs 41%)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Booker Bay has a bigger rental market to choose from (33% vs 13%)
- Wagstaffe leaves renters under less rental stress (22% vs 33%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Booker Bay
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (65/100 vs 51/100)
- has a shorter drive in (80 min vs 97 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (86.1 km vs 97 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Booker Bay
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (48% vs 3%)
- is more walkable (65/100 vs 51/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Booker Bay and Wagstaffe drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Booker Bay has more residents (1,442 vs 240); Wagstaffe has higher household incomes ($98,384 vs $63,336).
| Booker Bay | Wagstaffe | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,442 +83% vs other | 240 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +8.7% | +8.1% |
| Median age | 54 | 60 |
| Median household income | $63,336/yr | $98,384/yr +55% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $400/wk | $410/wk +2% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (25.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (25.4%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.3%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Booker Bay | Wagstaffe | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,610,000 | $2,013,000 |
| Median unit price | $1,195,000 | — |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 118 days from 10 sales | 120 days from 4 sales |
Zoning mix
Wagstaffe has more land zoned for conservation (50% vs 9%).
| Booker Bay | Wagstaffe | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 89% | 49% |
| Environmental | 9% | 50% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 2% | 0% |
| Planning zones cover 99% of Booker Bay and 100% of Wagstaffe. The rest is unzoned land such as water or road reserve. | ||
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Booker Bay | Wagstaffe | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,441 across Central Coast (NSW) same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +67% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Booker Bay | Wagstaffe | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.3% $850/wk on $1.02M | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Booker Bay | Wagstaffe | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 73% of NSW | Higher than 74% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 26% of NSW | Higher than 67% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 87% of NSW | Higher than 81% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 11% of NSW | Higher than 33% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 77% of NSW | Higher than 76% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 72% of NSW | Higher than 65% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 87% of NSW | — |
Liveability
Booker Bay is more walkable (65 vs 51).
| Booker Bay | Wagstaffe | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | — |
| Score | 62/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | very advantaged area decile 10/10 |
Risk profile
Wagstaffe carries more bushfire risk (68 vs 0).
| Booker Bay | Wagstaffe | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Moderate 68/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 46/100 | Low 38/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | Moderate 61/100 | None 0/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Booker Bay | Wagstaffe | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Booker Bay | Wagstaffe | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 1 |
| Childcare | 2 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
Mobility
Wagstaffe sits further from the CBD (97 km vs 86.1 km).
| Booker Bay | Wagstaffe | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 65/100 | 51/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 86.1 km | 97 km +13% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 80 min | 97 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.9% postcode 2257 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 31 postcode 2257 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (65.1%).
Setting
| Booker Bay | Wagstaffe | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 4 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 30 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 274 m 1.9 km to a named beach | 187 m 910 m to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Booker Bay | Wagstaffe | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 63/100 | 45/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 33% 828 premises | 0% 193 premises |
Climate
| Booker Bay | Wagstaffe | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,272 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 26.4°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 10.6°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Booker Bay | Wagstaffe | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.1 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.36 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Booker Bay | Wagstaffe | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,409/yr same for both | |
| Council | Central Coast (NSW) same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Booker Bay | Wagstaffe | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Robertson same for both | |
| Member | Gordon Reid same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Booker Bay | Wagstaffe | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Booker Bay
Wagstaffe
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Booker Bay
Other comparisons with Wagstaffe
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.