Bombo vs Kiama
Bombo is the younger of the two, with a median age of 40 against 52 in Kiama. In both, most households own their home and most homes are detached houses. In Bombo, most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Bombo: a median of $2 million, against $1.59 million in Kiama, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Bombo tends to suit couples, while Kiama suits people living alone, older residents, and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Bombo has more separate houses rather than flats (86% vs 55%)
- Kiama has more parks and reserves (17 vs 2)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Kiama
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($1,595,000 vs $2,000,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Bombo leaves renters under less rental stress (24% vs 30%)
- Kiama has cheaper rent ($478/wk vs $610/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Bombo sits closer to the CBD (120 km vs 123 km)
- Kiama is more walkable (84/100 vs 41/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Kiama
ahead on 4 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more GPs (4 vs 0)
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (45% vs 14%)
- has more residents already 65 and over (32% vs 15%)
- But Bombo carries lower crime risk (46/100 vs 59/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Bombo
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (56.2% vs 14.9%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Bombo and Kiama drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Kiama has more residents (7,904 vs 175); Bombo has higher household incomes ($134,888 vs $81,744).
| Bombo | Kiama | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 175 | 7,904 +4417% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +56.2% | +14.9% |
| Median age | 40 | 52 |
| Median household income | $134,888/yr +39% vs other | $81,744/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $610/wk +22% vs other | $478/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.9%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (6.3%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Bombo | Kiama | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2,000,000 | $1,595,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $905,000 |
| Median land price | — | $870,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 33 days from 77 sales |
Zoning mix
| Bombo | Kiama | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 42% | 35% |
| Residential | 5% | 34% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 26% | 6% |
| Environmental | 17% | 11% |
| Parks and recreation | 8% | 10% |
| Commercial | 0% | 3% |
| Planning zones cover 98% of Bombo and 100% of Kiama. The rest is unzoned land such as water or road reserve. | ||
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Bombo | Kiama | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 159 across Kiama same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -35% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Bombo | Kiama | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 2.6% $850/wk on $1.68M |
| Units | — | 3.3% $675/wk on $1.05M |
Ranking within NSW
| Bombo | Kiama | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 85% of NSW | Higher than 74% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 90% of NSW | Higher than 50% of NSW |
| Schools | — | Higher than 18% of NSW |
| Walkability | Higher than 79% of NSW | Higher than 94% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 35% of NSW | Higher than 21% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 88% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 100% of NSW | Higher than 99% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 9% of NSW |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 8% of NSW |
Liveability
Kiama is more walkable (84 vs 41).
| Bombo | Kiama | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | B |
| Score | — | 56/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 | very advantaged area decile 9/10 |
Risk profile
Kiama carries more crime risk (59 vs 46).
| Bombo | Kiama | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 46/100 | Moderate 59/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | Low 26/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 3 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Bombo | Kiama | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 3 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 3 |
Schools in Bombo
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Kiama
- Kiama High School Government · Secondary below peers
- Kiama Public School Government · Primary below peers
- Ss Peter and Paul Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Bombo | Kiama | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 40 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 17 |
| Childcare | 0 | 6 |
| GPs | 0 | 4 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 4 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 4 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 1 |
| Beaches | 2 | 3 |
| Waterways | 0 | 9 |
Mobility
Kiama sits further from the CBD (123 km vs 120 km).
| Bombo | Kiama | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 41/100 | 84/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 120 km | 123 km +2% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 106 min same for both | |
| Public transport score | 43/100 Rail · Bus | 81/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 7.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 57.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 7.5 min scheduled, not actual | 1 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.4% postcode 2533 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 47 postcode 2533 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (75.3%).
Setting
| Bombo | Kiama | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 10 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 87 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 426 m 665 m to a named beach | 986 m 976 m to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Bombo | Kiama | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 100/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 100% 86 premises | 100% 4,900 premises |
Climate
| Bombo | Kiama | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 974 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Bombo | Kiama | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.1 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.37 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Bombo | Kiama | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,898/yr same for both | |
| Council | Kiama same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Bombo | Kiama | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Gilmore same for both | |
| Member | Fiona Phillips same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Bombo | Kiama | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Bombo
Other comparisons with Kiama
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.