Boho vs Marraweeney
Marraweeney is the younger of the two, with a median age of 49 against 60 in Boho. In both, the large majority of households own their home and most homes are detached houses. In Boho, most households are couple families. On these figures, Boho tends to suit people living alone, families with children, and couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Marraweeney
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (3 vs 0)
- carries lower crime risk (20/100 vs 77/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (80% vs 58%)
- But Boho has more separate houses rather than flats (100% vs 73%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Marraweeney
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (21% vs 29%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Boho
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($0/wk vs $250/wk)
Weighs rent.
Commuting to the city
Boho
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has a shorter drive in (129 min vs 140 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Boho has more residents already 65 and over (33% vs 21%)
- Marraweeney carries lower crime risk (20/100 vs 77/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Marraweeney
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (48.1% vs 29.4%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Boho and Marraweeney drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Marraweeney rents higher ($250/wk vs $0/wk); Boho skews older (60 vs 49).
| Boho | Marraweeney | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 88 +12% vs other | 77 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +29.4% | +48.1% |
| Median age | 60 | 49 |
| Median household income | $81,224/yr +12% vs other | $71,500/yr |
| Median weekly rent | — | $250/wk (not reported on the other side) |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (26.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.5%).
Zoning mix
| Boho | Marraweeney | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 88% | 97% |
| Parks and recreation | 11% | 3% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Boho | Marraweeney | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 75 across Strathbogie same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +167% same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Boho | Marraweeney | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 48% of VIC | Higher than 36% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 12% of VIC | Higher than 49% of VIC |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 62% of VIC same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 23% of VIC | Higher than 14% of VIC |
Liveability
| Boho | Marraweeney | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Boho carries more bushfire risk (43 vs 0); Boho carries more crime risk (77 vs 20).
| Boho | Marraweeney | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 43/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | High 77/100 | Low 20/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Boho | Marraweeney | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Boho | Marraweeney | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 3 |
| Waterways | 13 | 0 |
Mobility
| Boho | Marraweeney | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Melbourne | 189.5 km same for both | |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 129 min | 140 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 3669 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 56 postcode 3669 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (69.0%).
Setting
| Boho | Marraweeney | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 224 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 406 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Boho | Marraweeney | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 24/100 | 17/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Satellite (Sky Muster) |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 37 premises | 0% 27 premises |
Climate
| Boho | Marraweeney | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 865 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 27.2°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 2.0°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Boho | Marraweeney | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,476/yr same for both | |
| Council | Strathbogie same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Boho | Marraweeney | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Indi same for both | |
| Member | Helen Haines same for both | |
| Party | Independent same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Boho | Marraweeney | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Boho
Marraweeney
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Boho
Other comparisons with Marraweeney
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.