Bluff vs Dingo
Dingo is the younger of the two, with a median age of 40 against 47 in Bluff. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Bluff, about half of households are people living alone. On these figures, Bluff tends to suit people living alone, while Dingo suits families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Bluff carries lower crime risk (53/100 vs 89/100)
- Dingo is already more of a family suburb (65% vs 53%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Bluff
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (12% vs 18%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Dingo
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($120/wk vs $170/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Dingo
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- sits closer to the CBD (779.4 km vs 810.3 km)
- has a shorter drive in (532 min vs 546 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Bluff
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (53/100 vs 89/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (16% vs 11%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Bluff
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (-13.1% vs -35.0%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Bluff and Dingo drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Bluff has higher household incomes ($116,324 vs $73,632); Bluff has more residents (324 vs 221).
| Bluff | Dingo | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 324 +32% vs other | 221 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -13.1% | -35.0% |
| Median age | 47 | 40 |
| Median household income | $116,324/yr +37% vs other | $73,632/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $170/wk +29% vs other | $120/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.0%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (2.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.6%).
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Bluff | Dingo | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $312,500 | — |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Development activity
| Bluff | Dingo | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 35 across Central Highlands (Qld) same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -75% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Bluff | Dingo | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 86% of QLD | Higher than 44% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 18% of QLD | Higher than 57% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 18% of QLD | Higher than 21% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 6% of QLD | Higher than 19% of QLD |
Liveability
| Bluff | Dingo | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 2/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Dingo carries more crime risk (89 vs 53); Dingo carries more bushfire risk (67 vs 48).
| Bluff | Dingo | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 48/100 | Moderate 67/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 53/100 | High 89/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Bluff | Dingo | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Bluff
- Bluff State School Government · Primary
Schools in Dingo
- Dingo State School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Bluff | Dingo | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 4 same for both | |
| Childcare | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 1 same for both | |
| EV chargers | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 36 same for both | |
Mobility
Bluff sits further from the CBD (810.3 km vs 779.4 km).
| Bluff | Dingo | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 810.3 km +4% vs other | 779.4 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 546 min | 532 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.2% postcode 4702 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 58 postcode 4702 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (56.4%).
Setting
| Bluff | Dingo | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 170 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 134 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Bluff | Dingo | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 15/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 30 premises | 0% 61 premises |
Council rates
| Bluff | Dingo | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,276/yr same for both | |
| Council | Central Highlands (Qld) same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Bluff | Dingo | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Flynn same for both | |
| Member | Colin Boyce same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Bluff | Dingo | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Bluff
Other comparisons with Dingo
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.