Blue Mountain vs Sarina Range
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Sarina Range, about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Blue Mountain tends to suit families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Blue Mountain
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is already more of a family suburb (100% vs 63%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Blue Mountain
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (5% vs 21%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Blue Mountain
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (25% vs 7%)
- has cheaper rent ($200/wk vs $230/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Blue Mountain sits closer to the CBD (948.3 km vs 951.7 km)
- Sarina Range has a shorter drive in (652 min vs 659 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Too close to call
Nothing among the 4 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Sarina Range
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (10.8% vs -9.8%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Blue Mountain and Sarina Range drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Sarina Range has more residents (277 vs 83); Sarina Range has higher household incomes ($101,816 vs $79,612).
| Blue Mountain | Sarina Range | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 83 | 277 +234% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -9.8% | +10.8% |
| Median age | 44 same for both | |
| Median household income | $79,612/yr | $101,816/yr +28% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $200/wk | $230/wk +15% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.5%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (6.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.4%).
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Development activity
| Blue Mountain | Sarina Range | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 27 across Isaac | 574 across Mackay |
| Approvals change year on year | +0% | -6% |
Ranking within QLD
| Blue Mountain | Sarina Range | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 50% of QLD | Higher than 75% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 35% of QLD | Higher than 47% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 5% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 12% of QLD | Higher than 25% of QLD |
Liveability
| Blue Mountain | Sarina Range | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 |
Risk profile
Blue Mountain carries more bushfire risk (48 vs 0).
| Blue Mountain | Sarina Range | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 48/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 49/100 | Moderate 53/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Blue Mountain | Sarina Range | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Blue Mountain | Sarina Range | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 2 |
| Waterways | 19 | 14 |
Mobility
Sarina Range sits further from the CBD (951.7 km vs 948.3 km).
| Blue Mountain | Sarina Range | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 948.3 km | 951.7 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 659 min | 652 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.1% postcode 4737 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 66 postcode 4737 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (67.6%).
Setting
| Blue Mountain | Sarina Range | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 203 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 221 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 28.3 km | 18.0 km |
NBN connectivity
| Blue Mountain | Sarina Range | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 15/100 | 17/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 17 premises | 0% 82 premises |
Climate
| Blue Mountain | Sarina Range | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,517 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.8°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 12.4°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Blue Mountain | Sarina Range | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $925/yr | $1,873/yr |
| Council | Isaac | Mackay |
Federal electorate
| Blue Mountain | Sarina Range | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Capricornia same for both | |
| Member | Michelle Landry same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Blue Mountain | Sarina Range | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Blue Mountain
Sarina Range
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Blue Mountain
Other comparisons with Sarina Range
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.