Blowhard vs Bald Hills
Bald Hills is the younger of the two, with a median age of 40 against 56 in Blowhard. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Blowhard, most households are people living alone. In Bald Hills, about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Blowhard tends to suit people living alone and older residents, while Bald Hills suits families with children and couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Blowhard has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
- Bald Hills is already more of a family suburb (61% vs 38%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Blowhard
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($150/wk vs $230/wk)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Blowhard is more walkable (20/100 vs 0/100)
- Bald Hills sits closer to the CBD (127.4 km vs 129.8 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Blowhard
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (20/100 vs 0/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (29% vs 10%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Bald Hills
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (6.5% vs -2.4%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Blowhard and Bald Hills drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Bald Hills rents higher ($230/wk vs $150/wk); Blowhard skews older (56 vs 40).
| Blowhard | Bald Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 82 | 114 +39% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -2.4% | +6.5% |
| Median age | 56 | 40 |
| Median household income | $75,816/yr | $86,632/yr +14% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $150/wk | $230/wk +53% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (26.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (30.5%).
Zoning mix
| Blowhard | Bald Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 99% same for both | |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Blowhard | Bald Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,451 across Ballarat same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +42% same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Blowhard | Bald Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 43% of VIC | Higher than 56% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 79% of VIC | Higher than 10% of VIC |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 38% of VIC | Higher than 51% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 67% of VIC | Higher than 52% of VIC |
Liveability
Blowhard is more walkable (20 vs 0).
| Blowhard | Bald Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Blowhard carries more flood risk (66 vs 0); Bald Hills carries more bushfire risk (33 vs 15).
| Blowhard | Bald Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 15/100 | Low 33/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 63/100 | Moderate 67/100 |
| Flood | Moderate 66/100 | None 0/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Blowhard | Bald Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Blowhard
- Mount Blowhard Primary School Government · Primary above peers
Schools in Bald Hills
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Blowhard | Bald Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Childcare | 1 | 0 |
Mobility
Blowhard sits further from the CBD (129.8 km vs 127.4 km).
| Blowhard | Bald Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 20/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 129.8 km +2% vs other | 127.4 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 92 min | 90 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 3352 | 0.5% postcode 3364 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 51 postcode 3352 | 53 postcode 3364 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (71.9%).
Setting
| Blowhard | Bald Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 416 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 436 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Blowhard | Bald Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 49 premises | 0% 46 premises |
Climate
| Blowhard | Bald Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 605 mm | 714 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | 25.7°C | — |
| Winter min (Jul) | 3.5°C | — |
Council rates
| Blowhard | Bald Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,086/yr same for both | |
| Council | Ballarat same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Blowhard | Bald Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Ballarat same for both | |
| Member | Catherine King same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Blowhard | Bald Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Blowhard
Other comparisons with Bald Hills
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.