Blackheath vs Mount Victoria
Mount Victoria is the younger of the two, with a median age of 49 against 53 in Blackheath. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Blackheath, about half of households are people living alone. In Mount Victoria, most households are people living alone. Houses cost more in Blackheath: a median of $920,000, against $825,000 in Mount Victoria.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Blackheath
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (28 vs 9)
- has more schools inside the suburb (2 vs 0)
- carries lower crime risk (47/100 vs 71/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Mount Victoria
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper land ($287,500 vs $547,500)
- has cheaper houses ($825,000 vs $920,000)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Blackheath
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (77/100 vs 0/100)
- has a shorter drive in (99 min vs 107 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (112.7 km vs 120.8 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Blackheath
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (77/100 vs 0/100)
- carries lower crime risk (47/100 vs 71/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Where they sit
Blackheath and Mount Victoria drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Blackheath has more residents (4,672 vs 945); Blackheath has higher household incomes ($69,264 vs $62,244).
| Blackheath | Mount Victoria | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,672 +80% vs other | 945 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +6.3% | — |
| Median age | 53 | 49 |
| Median household income | $69,264/yr +10% vs other | $62,244/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $380/wk same for both | |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.9%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (8.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Blackheath | Mount Victoria | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $920,000 | $825,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $547,500 | $287,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 24 days from 98 sales | 35 days from 21 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
26 vs 11 sales
80 vs 24 sales
42 vs 12 sales
Zoning mix
| Blackheath | Mount Victoria | |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental | 84% | 89% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 3% | 8% |
| Rural and farming | 5% | 1% |
| Other and special use | 3% | 0% |
| Residential | 3% | 2% |
| Parks and recreation | 3% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Blackheath | Mount Victoria | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 123 across Blue Mountains same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +14% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Blackheath | Mount Victoria | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.4% $625/wk on $944K | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Blackheath | Mount Victoria | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 41% of NSW | Higher than 32% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 32% of NSW | Higher than 24% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 91% of NSW | Higher than 12% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 46% of NSW | Higher than 47% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 90% of NSW | Higher than 80% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 74% of NSW | Higher than 70% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 42% of NSW | — |
Liveability
Blackheath is more walkable (77 vs 0); Blackheath scores higher overall (42 vs 23).
| Blackheath | Mount Victoria | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | D |
| Score | 42/100 | 23/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 |
Risk profile
Mount Victoria carries more crime risk (71 vs 47).
| Blackheath | Mount Victoria | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 90/100 | High 93/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 47/100 | High 71/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Blackheath | Mount Victoria | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 2 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Blackheath
- Mountains Christian College Independent · Combined above peers
- Blackheath Public School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Mount Victoria
- OneSchool Global NSW - Mount Victoria Independent · Combined above peers
- Mount Victoria Public School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Blackheath | Mount Victoria | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 2 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 20 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 28 | 9 |
| Childcare | 3 | 1 |
| GPs | 1 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 0 |
| Police stations | 1 same for both | |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 2 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 2 | 1 |
| Waterways | 11 | 2 |
Mobility
Mount Victoria sits further from the CBD (120.8 km vs 112.7 km).
| Blackheath | Mount Victoria | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 77/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 112.7 km | 120.8 km +7% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 99 min | 107 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Rail · Bus | 43/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 76.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 8.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual | 2.5 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.5% postcode 2785 | 1.0% postcode 2786 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 39 postcode 2785 | 39 postcode 2786 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (47.4%).
Setting
| Blackheath | Mount Victoria | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 1,045 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 969 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Blackheath | Mount Victoria | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 66/100 | 60/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 38% 3,149 premises | 28% 666 premises |
Climate
| Blackheath | Mount Victoria | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,147 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 23.8°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 3.2°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Blackheath | Mount Victoria | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,080/yr same for both | |
| Council | Blue Mountains same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Blackheath | Mount Victoria | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Macquarie same for both | |
| Member | Susan Templeman same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Blackheath | Mount Victoria | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Blackheath
Other comparisons with Mount Victoria
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.