Black Forest vs Everard Park
Black Forest is the younger of the two, with a median age of 39 against 42 in Everard Park. In Black Forest, most households own their home and most homes are detached houses. In Everard Park, about half of households rent, about half of homes are flats or apartments, and about half of households are people living alone. Everard Park is closer to the city centre: 4.7 km, against 5.7 km. On these figures, Everard Park tends to suit people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Black Forest
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (32/100 vs 77/100)
- has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (59% vs 36%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Black Forest leaves households under less mortgage stress (24% vs 31%)
- Everard Park has cheaper units ($478,500 vs $625,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Everard Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (82/100 vs 67/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Everard Park
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (64% vs 41%)
- has more residents already 65 and over (23% vs 17%)
- is more walkable (82/100 vs 67/100)
- But Black Forest carries lower crime risk (32/100 vs 77/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Black Forest and Everard Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Black Forest has more residents (1,982 vs 1,071); Black Forest has higher household incomes ($86,528 vs $72,176).
| Black Forest | Everard Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,982 +46% vs other | 1,071 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +2.5% | -0.6% |
| Median age | 39 | 42 |
| Median household income | $86,528/yr +17% vs other | $72,176/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $290/wk +1% vs other | $286/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.5%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Black Forest | Everard Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,500,000 | $1,417,500 |
| Median unit price | $625,000 | $478,500 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 16 days from 11 sales | 19 days from 6 sales |
Zoning mix
| Black Forest | Everard Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 90% | 97% |
| Industrial | 5% | 0% |
| Commercial | 5% | 3% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Black Forest | Everard Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 273 across Unley same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -67% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Black Forest | Everard Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 2.1% $650/wk on $1.63M | — |
| Units | — | 6.1% $515/wk on $440K |
Ranking within SA
| Black Forest | Everard Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 74% of SA | Higher than 87% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 64% of SA | Higher than 46% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 87% of SA | Higher than 93% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 21% of SA | Higher than 3% of SA |
| EV adoption | Higher than 98% of SA same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 88% of SA | Higher than 89% of SA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 1% of SA | — |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 99% of SA |
Liveability
Black Forest scores higher overall (77 vs 56); Everard Park is more walkable (82 vs 67).
| Black Forest | Everard Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A | B |
| Score | 77/100 | 56/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 |
Risk profile
Everard Park carries more crime risk (77 vs 32); Everard Park carries more flood risk (77 vs 33).
| Black Forest | Everard Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 32/100 | High 77/100 |
| Flood | Low 33/100 | High 77/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 5 within 5 km | 7 within 5 km |
Schools
| Black Forest | Everard Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Adelaide University, Adelaide City Campus, 4.2 km | 3 Adelaide University, Adelaide City Campus, 3.7 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 3.6% | 3.5% |
Schools in Black Forest
- Black Forest Primary School Government · Primary above peers
Schools in Everard Park
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Black Forest | Everard Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 5 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 1 |
| Childcare | 2 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 0 | 1 |
Mobility
| Black Forest | Everard Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 67/100 | 82/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 5.7 km +18% vs other | 4.7 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 11 min | 10 min |
| Public transport score | 96/100 Rail · Tram · Bus | 79/100 Tram · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 44.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 35.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.7% postcode 5035 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 40 postcode 5035 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (62.7%).
Setting
| Black Forest | Everard Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 33 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 32 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 6.1 km same for both | |
NBN connectivity
| Black Forest | Everard Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 75/100 | 76/100 |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 1,000 premises | 3% 659 premises |
Climate
| Black Forest | Everard Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 457 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.5°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Black Forest | Everard Park | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 1.12 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Black Forest | Everard Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,288/yr same for both | |
| Council | Unley same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Black Forest | Everard Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Boothby | Adelaide |
| Member | Louise Miller-Frost | Steve Georganas |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Black Forest | Everard Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Black Forest
Everard Park
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Black Forest
Other comparisons with Everard Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.