Berry Park vs Chisholm
Chisholm is the younger of the two, with a median age of 32 against 61 in Berry Park. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Berry Park, about half of households are couple families. In Chisholm, the large majority of households are couple families. On these figures, Berry Park tends to suit people living alone and older residents, while Chisholm suits families with children and couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Chisholm
ahead on 4 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more childcare (4 vs 0)
- has more parks and reserves (3 vs 0)
- has more schools inside the suburb (2 vs 0)
- But Berry Park carries lower crime risk (26/100 vs 50/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Chisholm
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (20% vs 45%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Berry Park has cheaper rent ($307/wk vs $550/wk)
- Chisholm leaves renters under less rental stress (20% vs 27%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Chisholm
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (52/100 vs 0/100)
- has a shorter drive in (119 min vs 126 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Berry Park
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- has more residents already 65 and over (40% vs 7%)
- carries lower crime risk (26/100 vs 50/100)
- But Chisholm is more walkable (52/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Chisholm
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (213.3% vs 43.3%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Berry Park and Chisholm drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Chisholm has more residents (4,577 vs 182); Chisholm has higher household incomes ($143,260 vs $58,500).
| Berry Park | Chisholm | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 182 | 4,577 +2415% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +43.3% | +213.3% |
| Median age | 61 | 32 |
| Median household income | $58,500/yr | $143,260/yr +145% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $307/wk | $550/wk +79% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.5%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.7%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Berry Park | Chisholm | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $1,050,500 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $597,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 29 days from 111 sales |
Zoning mix
Berry Park has more rural and farming land (94% vs 16%); Chisholm has more land zoned for conservation (20% vs 6%).
| Berry Park | Chisholm | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 94% | 16% |
| Residential | 0% | 62% |
| Environmental | 6% | 20% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Berry Park | Chisholm | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,413 across Maitland same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +20% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Berry Park | Chisholm | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 3.8% $820/wk on $1.13M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Berry Park | Chisholm | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — | Higher than 46% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 20% of NSW | Higher than 93% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 43% of NSW | Higher than 82% of NSW |
| Affordability | — | Higher than 87% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 57% of NSW | Higher than 68% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 91% of NSW | Higher than 97% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 61% of NSW |
Liveability
Chisholm is more walkable (52 vs 0).
| Berry Park | Chisholm | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | B |
| Score | — | 57/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 | very advantaged area decile 10/10 |
Risk profile
Chisholm carries more bushfire risk (39 vs 0); Chisholm carries more crime risk (50 vs 26).
| Berry Park | Chisholm | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Low 39/100 |
| Crime | Low 26/100 | Moderate 50/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km | 6 within 5 km |
Schools
| Berry Park | Chisholm | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 2 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 2 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Berry Park
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Chisholm
- St Aloysius Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary at peers
- St Bede's Catholic College Catholic · Secondary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Berry Park | Chisholm | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 3 |
| Childcare | 0 | 4 |
| Waterways | 0 | 2 |
Mobility
| Berry Park | Chisholm | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 52/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 161.5 km +1% vs other | 159.8 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 126 min | 119 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 2321 | 0.7% postcode 2322 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 69 postcode 2321 | 64 postcode 2322 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (68.9%).
Setting
| Berry Park | Chisholm | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 3 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 22 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 14.8 km | 15.7 km |
NBN connectivity
| Berry Park | Chisholm | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 82/100 | 95/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 74% 220 premises | 91% 890 premises |
Climate
| Berry Park | Chisholm | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 996 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.0°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 7.1°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Berry Park | Chisholm | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.72 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Berry Park | Chisholm | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,908/yr same for both | |
| Council | Maitland same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Berry Park | Chisholm | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Paterson same for both | |
| Member | Meryl Swanson same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Berry Park | Chisholm | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Chisholm
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Berry Park
Other comparisons with Chisholm
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.