Belmont vs Redcliffe
In both, the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Belmont, about half of households rent and about half of households are people living alone. In Redcliffe, most households own their home. Belmont is closer to the city centre: 9.2 km, against 10.7 km.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Belmont has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
- Redcliffe is already more of a family suburb (52% vs 43%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Redcliffe
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (78/100 vs 68/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 5 things we measure here
- Belmont has more GPs (3 vs 1)
- Redcliffe is more walkable (78/100 vs 68/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Belmont and Redcliffe drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Belmont has more residents (6,959 vs 5,030); Redcliffe skews older (38 vs 36).
| Belmont | Redcliffe | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,959 +28% vs other | 5,030 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +2.6% | +1.2% |
| Median age | 36 | 38 |
| Median household income | $80,964/yr | $81,380/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $350/wk +6% vs other | $330/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.5%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.4%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (14.1%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Belmont | Redcliffe | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $900,000 | $905,000 |
| Median unit price | $588,500 | $635,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 25 days from 60 sales | 14 days from 32 sales |
Unit price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
29 vs 8 sales
5 vs 6 sales
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
9 vs 8 sales
55 vs 35 sales
22 vs 24 sales
Development activity
| Belmont | Redcliffe | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 595 across Belmont same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +71% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Belmont | Redcliffe | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 5.0% $810/wk on $849K | 4.8% $760/wk on $829K |
| Units | 5.2% $700/wk on $699K | — |
Ranking within WA
| Belmont | Redcliffe | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 43% of WA | Higher than 44% of WA |
| Schools | Higher than 61% of WA | — |
| Walkability | Higher than 89% of WA | Higher than 93% of WA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 80% of WA | Higher than 81% of WA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 78% of WA | Higher than 82% of WA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 81% of WA | Higher than 74% of WA |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 41% of WA | — |
Liveability
Redcliffe is more walkable (78 vs 68).
| Belmont | Redcliffe | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 58/100 | 61/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 |
Risk profile
Belmont carries more flood risk (21 vs 0).
| Belmont | Redcliffe | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | High 91/100 | High 87/100 |
| Flood | Low 21/100 | None 0/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | Moderate 50/100 | High 70/100 |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 18 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Belmont | Redcliffe | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 3 | 2 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 1 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Curtin University of Technology, 6.7 km | 3 Curtin University of Technology, 8.4 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 2.1% | 1.5% |
Schools in Belmont
- Belmont City College Government · Secondary above peers
- Belmont Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Alta-1 College - Belmont Campus Independent · Secondary · Special school
Schools in Redcliffe
- Redcliffe Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- St Maria Goretti's Catholic School Catholic · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Belmont | Redcliffe | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 5 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 same for both | |
| Childcare | 1 | 2 |
| GPs | 3 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 2 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 2 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 2 same for both | |
| EV chargers | 1 | 0 |
Mobility
| Belmont | Redcliffe | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Distance to Perth | 9.2 km | 10.7 km +16% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 14 min | 15 min |
| Public transport score | 94/100 Bus | 94/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 222.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 281.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.1% postcode 6104 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 39 postcode 6104 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (76.5%).
Setting
| Belmont | Redcliffe | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 15 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 16 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 16.7 km | 18.1 km |
NBN connectivity
| Belmont | Redcliffe | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 65/100 | 70/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 37% 4,474 premises | 45% 2,444 premises |
Climate
| Belmont | Redcliffe | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 663 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 32.3°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.5°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Belmont | Redcliffe | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,937/yr same for both | |
| Council | Belmont same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Belmont | Redcliffe | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Swan same for both | |
| Member | Zaneta Mascarenhas same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Belmont | Redcliffe | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $800,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Belmont
Redcliffe
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Belmont
Other comparisons with Redcliffe
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.