Belmont South vs Marks Point
In both, most households own their home and most homes are detached houses. In Marks Point, about half of households are people living alone. On these figures, Marks Point tends to suit people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Belmont South
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more separate houses rather than flats (80% vs 58%)
- is already more of a family suburb (56% vs 44%)
- But Marks Point carries lower crime risk (70/100 vs 89/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Belmont South
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (22% vs 28%)
- has cheaper rent ($273/wk vs $318/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Marks Point
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (49/100 vs 35/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Marks Point
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (42% vs 20%)
- is more walkable (49/100 vs 35/100)
- carries lower crime risk (70/100 vs 89/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Belmont South and Marks Point drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Marks Point has more residents (1,861 vs 1,053); Marks Point rents higher ($318/wk vs $273/wk).
| Belmont South | Marks Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,053 | 1,861 +77% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -0.1% | +1.9% |
| Median age | 48 same for both | |
| Median household income | $64,428/yr +9% vs other | $58,344/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $273/wk | $318/wk +16% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.3%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (2.7%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Belmont South | Marks Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $970,000 | $1,000,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $697,500 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 36 days from 7 sales | 28 days from 17 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
6 vs 6 sales
15 vs 15 sales
8 vs 8 sales
Zoning mix
Belmont South has more land zoned for conservation (49% vs 28%).
| Belmont South | Marks Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 18% | 63% |
| Environmental | 49% | 28% |
| Parks and recreation | 20% | 5% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 13% | 3% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Belmont South | Marks Point | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,212 across Lake Macquarie same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +2% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Belmont South | Marks Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 3.5% $930/wk on $1.39M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Belmont South | Marks Point | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 44% of NSW | Higher than 45% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 27% of NSW | Higher than 18% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 77% of NSW | Higher than 81% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 38% of NSW | Higher than 30% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 68% of NSW | Higher than 69% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 73% of NSW | Higher than 71% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 44% of NSW |
Liveability
Marks Point scores higher overall (43 vs 25); Marks Point is more walkable (49 vs 35).
| Belmont South | Marks Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | D | C |
| Score | 25/100 | 43/100 |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 2/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Belmont South carries more bushfire risk (30 vs 0); Belmont South carries more crime risk (89 vs 70).
| Belmont South | Marks Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 30/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | High 89/100 | High 70/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | Moderate 53/100 | None 0/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Belmont South | Marks Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Belmont South
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Marks Point
- Marks Point Public School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Belmont South | Marks Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 2 |
| Childcare | 1 | 2 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 1 same for both | |
Mobility
| Belmont South | Marks Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 35/100 | 49/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 134.5 km +1% vs other | 133.1 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 108 min | 106 min |
| Public transport score | 78/100 Bus | 77/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 31.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 30.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.7% postcode 2280 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 44 postcode 2280 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (75.3%).
Setting
| Belmont South | Marks Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 8 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 1 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 501 m 3.4 km to a named beach | 1.2 km 2.8 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Belmont South | Marks Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 65/100 | 61/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 36% 588 premises | 28% 989 premises |
Climate
| Belmont South | Marks Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,025 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 25.4°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 10.2°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Belmont South | Marks Point | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 11.6 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.27 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Belmont South | Marks Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,708/yr same for both | |
| Council | Lake Macquarie same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Belmont South | Marks Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Shortland same for both | |
| Member | Pat Conroy same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Belmont South | Marks Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Belmont South
Other comparisons with Marks Point
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.