Belmont North vs Redhead
Belmont North is the younger of the two, with a median age of 40 against 48 in Redhead. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Belmont North, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Redhead: a median of $1.61 million, against $1.03 million in Belmont North, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Belmont North tends to suit buyers on a tighter budget, while Redhead suits people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Redhead
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (7 vs 1)
- carries lower crime risk (48/100 vs 64/100)
- But Belmont North is already more of a family suburb (67% vs 53%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Belmont North
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- has cheaper houses ($1,035,000 vs $1,613,500)
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (26% vs 33%)
- But Redhead has cheaper units ($529,000 vs $630,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Belmont North
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($380/wk vs $420/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Belmont North sits closer to the CBD (138.2 km vs 142.3 km)
- Redhead is more walkable (72/100 vs 63/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Redhead
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more residents already 65 and over (28% vs 20%)
- carries lower crime risk (48/100 vs 64/100)
- is more walkable (72/100 vs 63/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Belmont North returns a higher gross yield on houses (3.9% vs 3.0%)
- Redhead is growing faster (7.7% vs -0.7%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Belmont North and Redhead drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Belmont North has more residents (6,291 vs 3,785); Redhead skews older (48 vs 40).
| Belmont North | Redhead | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,291 +40% vs other | 3,785 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -0.7% | +7.7% |
| Median age | 40 | 48 |
| Median household income | $90,428/yr +8% vs other | $83,096/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $380/wk | $420/wk +11% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (13.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.0%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.5%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Belmont North | Redhead | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,035,000 | $1,613,500 |
| Median unit price | $630,000 | $529,000 |
| Median land price | $1,010,000 | $1,100,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 23 days from 92 sales | 36 days from 29 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
9 vs 14 sales
79 vs 20 sales
44 vs 22 sales
22 vs 12 sales
Zoning mix
Redhead has more land zoned for conservation (40% vs 21%).
| Belmont North | Redhead | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 64% | 30% |
| Environmental | 21% | 40% |
| Parks and recreation | 8% | 15% |
| Industrial | 3% | 8% |
| Rural and farming | 1% | 7% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 4% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Belmont North | Redhead | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,212 across Lake Macquarie same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +2% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Belmont North | Redhead | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.9% $720/wk on $958K | 3.0% $850/wk on $1.5M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Belmont North | Redhead | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 48% of NSW | Higher than 78% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 58% of NSW | Higher than 51% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 86% of NSW | Higher than 89% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 59% of NSW | Higher than 17% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 68% of NSW | Higher than 77% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 75% of NSW | Higher than 72% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 68% of NSW | Higher than 20% of NSW |
Liveability
Redhead scores higher overall (46 vs 40); Redhead is more walkable (72 vs 63).
| Belmont North | Redhead | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C same for both | |
| Score | 40/100 | 46/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 | advantaged area decile 8/10 |
Risk profile
Redhead carries more bushfire risk (78 vs 47); Belmont North carries more crime risk (64 vs 48).
| Belmont North | Redhead | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 47/100 | High 78/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 64/100 | Moderate 48/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 | Low 37/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km | 0 within 5 km |
Schools
| Belmont North | Redhead | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 2 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 1 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Belmont North
- Belmont North Public School Government · Primary above peers
- Belmont Christian College Independent · Combined at peers
Schools in Redhead
- Redhead Public School Government · Primary above peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Belmont North | Redhead | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 2 | 6 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 7 |
| Childcare | 5 | 3 |
| GPs | 0 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 1 same for both | |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 3 | 1 |
| Beaches | 0 | 2 |
| Waterways | 1 | 3 |
Mobility
Redhead sits further from the CBD (142.3 km vs 138.2 km).
| Belmont North | Redhead | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 63/100 | 72/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 138.2 km | 142.3 km +3% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 112 min | 116 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus | 74/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 107.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 50.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.7% postcode 2280 | 0.9% postcode 2290 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 44 postcode 2280 | 37 postcode 2290 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (72.9%).
Setting
| Belmont North | Redhead | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 25 m above sea level, at the suburb centre same for both | |
| Distance to the ocean | 2.5 km 4.4 km to a named beach | 1.0 km 1.0 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Belmont North | Redhead | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 68/100 | 63/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 42% 2,586 premises | 33% 1,923 premises |
Climate
| Belmont North | Redhead | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,025 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 25.4°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 10.2°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Belmont North | Redhead | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 21.7 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.64 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Belmont North | Redhead | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,708/yr same for both | |
| Council | Lake Macquarie same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Belmont North | Redhead | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Shortland same for both | |
| Member | Pat Conroy same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Belmont North | Redhead | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Belmont North
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Belmont North
Other comparisons with Redhead
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.