Bellamack vs Rosebery
In both, most homes are detached houses and about half of households are couple families. In Bellamack, most households rent. In Rosebery, about half of households rent.
Rosebery is the larger and more walkable suburb, with a walkability score of 78 compared to Bellamack's 50, and a notably higher liveability score of 78 versus 63. Household incomes are similar, though Rosebery edges ahead at $124,644 yearly. Rental costs are higher in Rosebery at $420 per week against $360, while house prices are comparable; however, Bellamack offers better value in units at $450,000 median price versus $390,000 in Rosebery. Bellamack may suit buyers prioritising unit affordability and rental yield on houses, while Rosebery appeals to those who value walkability and a more established community feel.
Written by an AI language model from the figures below. Every number in it is checked against those figures before it is published.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Too close to call
Nothing among the 5 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs schools, house stock, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Rosebery
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper units ($390,000 vs $450,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Bellamack
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($360/wk vs $420/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Rosebery
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (78/100 vs 50/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Rosebery
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (78/100 vs 50/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, and walkability.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Bellamack and Rosebery drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Rosebery has more residents (4,127 vs 2,423); Rosebery rents higher ($420/wk vs $360/wk).
| Bellamack | Rosebery | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,423 | 4,127 +70% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -1.4% | -2.2% |
| Median age | 29 | 30 |
| Median household income | $121,212/yr | $124,644/yr +3% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $360/wk | $420/wk +17% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.3%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.2%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Bellamack | Rosebery | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $722,500 | $718,123 |
| Median unit price | $450,000 | $390,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 21 days from 33 sales | 20 days from 42 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
22 vs 28 sales
45 vs 55 sales
Unit price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
10 vs 33 sales
11 vs 12 sales
Development activity
| Bellamack | Rosebery | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 247 across Palmerston same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -3% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Bellamack | Rosebery | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 5.3% $810/wk on $800K | 5.1% $800/wk on $820K |
| Units | 7.7% $612/wk on $412K | — |
Ranking within NT
| Bellamack | Rosebery | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 82% of NT | Higher than 85% of NT |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 83% of NT | Higher than 97% of NT |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 68% of NT | Higher than 66% of NT |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 89% of NT | Higher than 85% of NT |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 49% of NT | Higher than 45% of NT |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 88% of NT | — |
Liveability
Rosebery is more walkable (78 vs 50); Rosebery scores higher overall (78 vs 63).
| Bellamack | Rosebery | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | A |
| Score | 63/100 | 78/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 | very advantaged area decile 9/10 |
Risk profile
| Bellamack | Rosebery | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Crime | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Bellamack | Rosebery | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
Schools in Bellamack
- Forrest Parade School Government · Primary · Special school
Schools in Rosebery
- Rosebery Primary School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Bellamack | Rosebery | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 2 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 2 |
| Childcare | 0 | 2 |
| GPs | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 1 |
Mobility
| Bellamack | Rosebery | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 50/100 | 78/100 |
| Distance to Darwin | 25.1 km | 25.4 km +1% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 26 min same for both | |
| Public transport score | 40/100 Bus | 77/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 10.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 29.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 0832 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 51 postcode 0832 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (86.3%).
Setting
| Bellamack | Rosebery | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 20 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 21 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 2.1 km | 3.4 km |
NBN connectivity
| Bellamack | Rosebery | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 100/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 100% 112 premises | 100% 1,555 premises |
Climate
| Bellamack | Rosebery | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,836 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 32.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 19.8°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Bellamack | Rosebery | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,608/yr same for both | |
| Council | Palmerston same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Bellamack | Rosebery | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Solomon same for both | |
| Member | Luke John Gosling same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Bellamack | Rosebery | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $50,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Bellamack
Rosebery
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Bellamack
Other comparisons with Rosebery
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.