Belford vs North Rothbury
North Rothbury is the younger of the two, with a median age of 30 against 44 in Belford. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Belford, the large majority of households are couple families. In North Rothbury, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Belford: a median of $1.05 million, against $875,000 in North Rothbury, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Belford tends to suit couples, while North Rothbury suits young adults, families with children, and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Belford
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (56/100 vs 92/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (100% vs 73%)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (107% vs 96%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Belford has cheaper land ($295,000 vs $765,000)
- North Rothbury has cheaper houses ($875,000 vs $1,050,000)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
North Rothbury
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (36% vs 8%)
- has cheaper rent ($450/wk vs $530/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
North Rothbury
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (14/100 vs 0/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (182 km vs 186.5 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Belford
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- has more residents already 65 and over (14% vs 7%)
- carries lower crime risk (56/100 vs 92/100)
- But North Rothbury is more walkable (14/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
North Rothbury
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (178.6% vs 2.9%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Belford and North Rothbury drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
North Rothbury has more residents (2,502 vs 176); Belford skews older (44 vs 30).
| Belford | North Rothbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 176 | 2,502 +1322% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +2.9% | +178.6% |
| Median age | 44 | 30 |
| Median household income | $147,316/yr +22% vs other | $114,712/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $530/wk +15% vs other | $450/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (2.8%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.7%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Belford | North Rothbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,050,000 | $875,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $295,000 | $765,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 34 days from 119 sales |
Zoning mix
Belford has more rural and farming land (77% vs 42%).
| Belford | North Rothbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 77% | 42% |
| Residential | 1% | 35% |
| Environmental | 18% | 19% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 4% same for both | |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Belford | North Rothbury | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 121 across Singleton | 719 across Cessnock |
| Approvals change year on year | +46% | -31% |
Gross rental yield
| Belford | North Rothbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 4.2% $740/wk on $919K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Belford | North Rothbury | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 54% of NSW | Higher than 32% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 94% of NSW | Higher than 79% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 33% of NSW | Higher than 64% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 84% of NSW | Higher than 85% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 30% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 48% of NSW | Higher than 95% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 82% of NSW |
Liveability
North Rothbury is more walkable (14 vs 0).
| Belford | North Rothbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | D |
| Score | — | 27/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 |
Risk profile
North Rothbury carries more bushfire risk (47 vs 11); North Rothbury carries more crime risk (92 vs 56).
| Belford | North Rothbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 11/100 | Moderate 47/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 56/100 | High 92/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 2 within 5 km |
Schools
| Belford | North Rothbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Belford | North Rothbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 1 |
| Childcare | 0 | 2 |
| GPs | 0 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 2 | 3 |
Mobility
Belford sits further from the CBD (186.5 km vs 182 km).
| Belford | North Rothbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 14/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 186.5 km +2% vs other | 182 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 129 min same for both | |
| Public transport score | 29/100 Bus | 79/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 7.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 42.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.3% postcode 2335 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 82 postcode 2335 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (78.6%).
Setting
| Belford | North Rothbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 72 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 70 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 49.4 km | 43.3 km |
NBN connectivity
| Belford | North Rothbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 29/100 | 91/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 65 premises | 84% 2,189 premises |
Climate
| Belford | North Rothbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 804 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.0°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 5.1°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Belford | North Rothbury | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | — same for both | |
| PM10 | 19.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Belford | North Rothbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,287/yr | $1,405/yr |
| Council | Singleton | Cessnock |
Federal electorate
| Belford | North Rothbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Hunter same for both | |
| Member | Dan Repacholi same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Belford | North Rothbury | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Belford
North Rothbury
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Belford
Other comparisons with North Rothbury
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.