Bedgerabong vs Forbes
Forbes is the younger of the two, with a median age of 42 against 45 in Bedgerabong. In both, most households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and about half of households are people living alone. Houses cost more in Bedgerabong: a median of $770,000, against $475,000 in Forbes, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Forbes tends to suit buyers on a tighter budget.
Bedgerabong is a very small rural community of 127 people, while Forbes is a regional town of 8157, offering vastly different lifestyles. Bedgerabong has a higher median household income at $71,500 compared to Forbes's $63,492, and significantly lower crime risk at 52 versus 91. However, Bedgerabong's median house price of $770,000 is substantially higher than Forbes's $467,500, and it sits further from the CBD at 419.1 km. Forbes offers better walkability and lower bushfire risk, making it more suitable for those seeking an established town with services, while Bedgerabong appeals to buyers seeking rural isolation and stronger household incomes despite the premium property costs.
Written by an AI language model from the figures below. Every number in it is checked against those figures before it is published.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Forbes
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (36 vs 1)
- has more childcare (7 vs 0)
- has more schools inside the suburb (5 vs 1)
- But Bedgerabong carries lower crime risk (76/100 vs 90/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Bedgerabong leaves households under less mortgage stress (0% vs 24%)
- Forbes has cheaper houses ($475,000 vs $770,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Forbes
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (29% vs 12%)
- has cheaper rent ($230/wk vs $250/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Forbes
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (18/100 vs 0/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (385.4 km vs 419.1 km)
- has a shorter drive in (310 min vs 334 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Forbes
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (18/100 vs 0/100)
- has more GPs (3 vs 0)
- has more residents already 65 and over (24% vs 19%)
- But Bedgerabong carries lower crime risk (76/100 vs 90/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Forbes
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (-3.3% vs -14.8%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Bedgerabong and Forbes drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Forbes has more residents (8,157 vs 127); Bedgerabong has higher household incomes ($71,500 vs $63,492).
| Bedgerabong | Forbes | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 127 | 8,157 +6323% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -14.8% | -3.3% |
| Median age | 45 | 42 |
| Median household income | $71,500/yr +11% vs other | $63,492/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $250/wk +8% vs other | $230/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.9%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.1%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Bedgerabong | Forbes | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $770,000 | $475,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $395,000 |
| Median land price | — | $212,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 62 days from 58 sales |
Zoning mix
| Bedgerabong | Forbes | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 100% | 96% |
| Residential | 0% | 3% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Bedgerabong | Forbes | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 31 across Forbes same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +125% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Bedgerabong | Forbes | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 3.9% $440/wk on $580K |
| Units | — | 4.0% $380/wk on $500K |
Ranking within NSW
| Bedgerabong | Forbes | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 31% of NSW | Higher than 13% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 38% of NSW | Higher than 26% of NSW |
| Schools | — | Higher than 47% of NSW |
| Walkability | Higher than 38% of NSW | Higher than 69% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 59% of NSW | Higher than 85% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 3% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 20% of NSW | Higher than 68% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 70% of NSW |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 22% of NSW |
Liveability
Forbes is more walkable (18 vs 0).
| Bedgerabong | Forbes | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | D |
| Score | — | 29/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 | below-average income decile 3/10 |
Risk profile
Forbes carries more crime risk (90 vs 76).
| Bedgerabong | Forbes | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 31/100 | Low 23/100 |
| Crime | High 76/100 | High 90/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Bedgerabong | Forbes | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 5 |
| Rated above peers | 1 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 2 |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 2 |
Schools in Bedgerabong
- Bedgerabong Public School Government · Primary above peers
Schools in Forbes
- Red Bend Catholic College Independent · Secondary above peers
- Forbes Public School Government · Primary at peers
- St Laurence's Parish School Catholic · Primary at peers
- Forbes High School Government · Secondary below peers
- Forbes North Public School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Bedgerabong | Forbes | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 2 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 8 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 36 |
| Childcare | 0 | 7 |
| GPs | 0 | 3 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 2 |
| Hospitals | 0 | 2 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 4 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 5 |
| Waterways | 4 | 36 |
Mobility
Bedgerabong sits further from the CBD (419.1 km vs 385.4 km).
| Bedgerabong | Forbes | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 18/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 419.1 km +8% vs other | 385.4 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 334 min | 310 min |
| Public transport score | 21/100 Bus | 66/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 4.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 110.5 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 2 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.1% postcode 2871 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 48 postcode 2871 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (79.4%).
Setting
| Bedgerabong | Forbes | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 218 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 235 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Bedgerabong | Forbes | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 15/100 | 55/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) | Fibre to the node |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 21 premises | 24% 4,208 premises |
Council rates
| Bedgerabong | Forbes | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $957/yr same for both | |
| Council | Forbes same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Bedgerabong | Forbes | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Parkes same for both | |
| Member | Jamie Chaffey same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Bedgerabong | Forbes | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Forbes
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Bedgerabong
Other comparisons with Forbes
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.