Bedford Park vs Tonsley
Bedford Park is the younger of the two, with a median age of 28 against 31 in Tonsley. In Bedford Park, about half of households rent and most homes are detached houses. In Tonsley, most households own their home and most households are people living alone. Houses cost more in Bedford Park: a median of $965,000, against $800,000 in Tonsley, though rent is higher in Tonsley. Tonsley is closer to the city centre: 11.1 km, against 12.7 km. On these figures, Bedford Park tends to suit share households, while Tonsley suits people living alone and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Bedford Park
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (8 vs 3)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (69% vs 49%)
- is already more of a family suburb (40% vs 29%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Tonsley
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($800,000 vs $965,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Bedford Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($290/wk vs $330/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Tonsley
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- gets more of its commuters onto trains and trams (12% vs 4%)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Tonsley
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (51% vs 31%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Where they sit
Bedford Park and Tonsley drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Bedford Park has more residents (1,882 vs 743); Tonsley rents higher ($330/wk vs $290/wk).
| Bedford Park | Tonsley | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,882 +61% vs other | 743 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +2.5% | — |
| Median age | 28 | 31 |
| Median household income | $75,296/yr | $76,440/yr +2% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $290/wk | $330/wk +14% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (29.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.1%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (6.1%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Bedford Park | Tonsley | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $965,000 | $800,000 |
| Median unit price | $440,750 | — |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 29 days from 10 sales | — |
Zoning mix
| Bedford Park | Tonsley | |
|---|---|---|
| Commercial | 67% | 61% |
| Residential | 22% | 29% |
| Industrial | 3% | 10% |
| Parks and recreation | 6% | 0% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 2% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Bedford Park | Tonsley | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 188 across Mitcham | 809 across Marion |
| Approvals change year on year | +32% | -31% |
Gross rental yield
| Bedford Park | Tonsley | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 4.6% $680/wk on $772K |
| Units | — | 5.0% $600/wk on $630K |
Ranking within SA
| Bedford Park | Tonsley | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 40% of SA | Higher than 16% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 50% of SA | Higher than 52% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 90% of SA | Higher than 88% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 54% of SA | Higher than 80% of SA |
| EV adoption | Higher than 89% of SA | Higher than 88% of SA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 80% of SA | Higher than 79% of SA |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 90% of SA |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 70% of SA |
Liveability
Tonsley scores higher overall (60 vs 50).
| Bedford Park | Tonsley | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | B |
| Score | 50/100 | 60/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 |
Risk profile
Bedford Park carries more flood risk (62 vs 10).
| Bedford Park | Tonsley | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | High 87/100 | High 90/100 |
| Flood | Moderate 62/100 | Low 10/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 4 within 5 km | 2 within 5 km |
Schools
| Bedford Park | Tonsley | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 2 Bedford Park, 0.0 km | 3 Tonsley, 1.2 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 23.3% | 8.9% |
Schools in Bedford Park
- Australian Science and Mathematics School Government · Secondary
Schools in Tonsley
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Bedford Park | Tonsley | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 3 |
| Childcare | 2 | 1 |
| GPs | 1 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 0 |
| Hospitals | 2 | 0 |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 0 |
| EV chargers | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 1 | 0 |
Mobility
| Bedford Park | Tonsley | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 75/100 | 70/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 12.7 km +13% vs other | 11.1 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 20 min | 19 min |
| Public transport score | 89/100 Rail · Bus | 90/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 304.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 33.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual | 1 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.5% postcode 5042 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 54 postcode 5042 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (64.1%).
Setting
| Bedford Park | Tonsley | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 85 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 52 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 4.9 km | 5.2 km |
NBN connectivity
| Bedford Park | Tonsley | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 66/100 | 65/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 25% 926 premises | 36% 338 premises |
Climate
| Bedford Park | Tonsley | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 394 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 7.8°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Bedford Park | Tonsley | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 1.12 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Bedford Park | Tonsley | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,296/yr | $1,782/yr |
| Council | Mitcham | Marion |
Federal electorate
| Bedford Park | Tonsley | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Boothby same for both | |
| Member | Louise Miller-Frost same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Bedford Park | Tonsley | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Bedford Park
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Bedford Park
Other comparisons with Tonsley
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.