Bedford Park vs Eden Hills
Bedford Park is the younger of the two, with a median age of 28 against 43 in Eden Hills. In both, most homes are detached houses. In Bedford Park, about half of households rent. In Eden Hills, the large majority of households own their home and about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Eden Hills: a median of $1.19 million, against $965,000 in Bedford Park, and rent is higher there too. Bedford Park is closer to the city centre: 12.7 km, against 14.6 km. On these figures, Bedford Park tends to suit renters, young adults, and people living alone, while Eden Hills suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Eden Hills
ahead on 4 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more schools inside the suburb (3 vs 1)
- carries lower crime risk (37/100 vs 87/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (68% vs 40%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Bedford Park
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper units ($440,750 vs $575,000)
- has cheaper houses ($965,000 vs $1,194,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Bedford Park
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (52% vs 12%)
- has cheaper rent ($290/wk vs $388/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Bedford Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (75/100 vs 63/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 5 things we measure here
- Bedford Park has more units and townhouses to downsize into (31% vs 5%)
- Eden Hills carries lower crime risk (37/100 vs 87/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Bedford Park and Eden Hills drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Eden Hills has more residents (3,020 vs 1,882); Eden Hills skews older (43 vs 28).
| Bedford Park | Eden Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,882 | 3,020 +60% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +2.5% | +1.3% |
| Median age | 28 | 43 |
| Median household income | $75,296/yr | $107,224/yr +42% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $290/wk | $388/wk +34% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.1%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (8.2%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Bedford Park | Eden Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $965,000 | $1,194,000 |
| Median unit price | $440,750 | $575,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 29 days from 10 sales | 20 days from 23 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
17 vs 14 sales
10 vs 20 sales
Zoning mix
Bedford Park has more commercially zoned land (67% vs 0%); Eden Hills has more land zoned for conservation (30% vs 0%).
| Bedford Park | Eden Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Commercial | 67% | 0% |
| Residential | 22% | 60% |
| Environmental | 0% | 30% |
| Parks and recreation | 6% same for both | |
| Infrastructure and transport | 2% | 4% |
| Industrial | 3% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Bedford Park | Eden Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 188 across Mitcham same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +32% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Bedford Park | Eden Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 2.9% $640/wk on $1.13M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Bedford Park | Eden Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 40% of SA | Higher than 65% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 50% of SA | Higher than 84% of SA |
| Schools | — | Higher than 13% of SA |
| Walkability | Higher than 90% of SA | Higher than 85% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 54% of SA | Higher than 64% of SA |
| EV adoption | Higher than 89% of SA | Higher than 91% of SA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 80% of SA same for both | |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 13% of SA |
Liveability
Bedford Park is more walkable (75 vs 63); Eden Hills scores higher overall (57 vs 50).
| Bedford Park | Eden Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | B |
| Score | 50/100 | 57/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | very advantaged area decile 9/10 |
Risk profile
Eden Hills carries more bushfire risk (21 vs 0); Bedford Park carries more crime risk (87 vs 37).
| Bedford Park | Eden Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Low 21/100 |
| Crime | High 87/100 | Low 37/100 |
| Flood | Moderate 62/100 | Moderate 48/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 4 within 5 km | 2 within 5 km |
Schools
| Bedford Park | Eden Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 3 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 2 |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
| Universities within 10 km | 2 Bedford Park, 0.0 km | 2 Bedford Park, 2.4 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 23.3% | 3.2% |
Schools in Bedford Park
- Australian Science and Mathematics School Government · Secondary
Schools in Eden Hills
- Blackwood High School Government · Secondary at peers
- Eden Hills Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Blackwood Primary School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Bedford Park | Eden Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 same for both | |
| Childcare | 2 | 4 |
| GPs | 1 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 0 |
| Hospitals | 2 | 0 |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 1 | 0 |
Mobility
| Bedford Park | Eden Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 75/100 | 63/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 12.7 km | 14.6 km +15% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 20 min | 24 min |
| Public transport score | 89/100 Rail · Bus | 91/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 304.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 53.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual | 1 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.5% postcode 5042 | 1.8% postcode 5050 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 54 postcode 5042 | 71 postcode 5050 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (67.5%).
Setting
| Bedford Park | Eden Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 85 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 190 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 4.9 km | 7.3 km |
NBN connectivity
| Bedford Park | Eden Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 66/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 25% 926 premises | 38% 1,234 premises |
Climate
| Bedford Park | Eden Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 394 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 7.8°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Bedford Park | Eden Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 1.12 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Bedford Park | Eden Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,296/yr same for both | |
| Council | Mitcham same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Bedford Park | Eden Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Boothby same for both | |
| Member | Louise Miller-Frost same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Bedford Park | Eden Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Bedford Park
Eden Hills
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Bedford Park
Other comparisons with Eden Hills
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.