Beckom vs Walleroobie
Walleroobie is the younger of the two, with a median age of 37 against 42 in Beckom. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Beckom, about half of households are couple families. In Walleroobie, most households are couple families. On these figures, Beckom tends to suit older residents, while Walleroobie suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Walleroobie
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (11/100 vs 82/100)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (100% vs 89%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
Renters
Beckom
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($105/wk vs $175/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Walleroobie
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- sits closer to the CBD (476 km vs 484.6 km)
- has a shorter drive in (327 min vs 332 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Beckom has more residents already 65 and over (24% vs 13%)
- Walleroobie carries lower crime risk (11/100 vs 82/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Beckom
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (-1.6% vs -25.4%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Beckom and Walleroobie drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Beckom has more residents (123 vs 53); Walleroobie rents higher ($175/wk vs $105/wk).
| Beckom | Walleroobie | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 123 +57% vs other | 53 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -1.6% | -25.4% |
| Median age | 42 | 37 |
| Median household income | $58,500/yr | $72,748/yr +24% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $105/wk | $175/wk +67% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (14.6%).
Property market
| Beckom | Walleroobie | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $136,000 | — |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $32,250 | — |
Zoning mix
| Beckom | Walleroobie | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 100% same for both | |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Beckom | Walleroobie | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 15 across Bland | 26 across Coolamon |
| Approvals change year on year | -100% | -33% |
Ranking within NSW
| Beckom | Walleroobie | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 2% of NSW | — |
| Income | Higher than 20% of NSW | Higher than 39% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 35% of NSW | Higher than 36% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 98% of NSW | — |
| EV adoption | — same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 43% of NSW | Higher than 32% of NSW |
Liveability
| Beckom | Walleroobie | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 |
Risk profile
Beckom carries more crime risk (82 vs 11).
| Beckom | Walleroobie | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 18/100 | Low 15/100 |
| Crime | High 82/100 | Low 11/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Beckom | Walleroobie | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Beckom | Walleroobie | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 6 | 9 |
Mobility
Beckom sits further from the CBD (484.6 km vs 476 km).
| Beckom | Walleroobie | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Sydney | 484.6 km +2% vs other | 476 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 332 min | 327 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.0% postcode 2665 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 46 postcode 2665 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (58.0%).
Setting
| Beckom | Walleroobie | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 213 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 264 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Beckom | Walleroobie | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 28/100 | 22/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Satellite (Sky Muster) |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 70 premises | 0% 26 premises |
Climate
| Beckom | Walleroobie | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 420 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Beckom | Walleroobie | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,508/yr | $441/yr |
| Council | Bland | Coolamon |
Federal electorate
| Beckom | Walleroobie | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Parkes | Riverina |
| Member | Jamie Chaffey | Michael Mccormack |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Beckom | Walleroobie | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Beckom
Other comparisons with Walleroobie
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.