Beaconsfield Upper vs Pakenham
Pakenham is the younger of the two, with a median age of 33 against 42 in Beaconsfield Upper. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Beaconsfield Upper, the large majority of households are couple families. In Pakenham, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Beaconsfield Upper: a median of $1.32 million, against $700,000 in Pakenham. On these figures, Beaconsfield Upper tends to suit couples, while Pakenham suits buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Beaconsfield Upper carries lower crime risk (24/100 vs 74/100)
- Pakenham has more schools inside the suburb (15 vs 1)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Pakenham
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper land ($525,000 vs $1,155,500)
- has cheaper houses ($700,000 vs $1,322,500)
- But Beaconsfield Upper leaves households under less mortgage stress (19% vs 24%)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Beaconsfield Upper leaves renters under less rental stress (13% vs 21%)
- Pakenham has a bigger rental market to choose from (32% vs 4%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Beaconsfield Upper sits closer to the CBD (55.4 km vs 62.4 km)
- Pakenham is more walkable (94/100 vs 32/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Pakenham
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (14% vs 0%)
- has more GPs (13 vs 1)
- is more walkable (94/100 vs 32/100)
- But Beaconsfield Upper carries lower crime risk (24/100 vs 74/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Pakenham
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (16.6% vs 4.8%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Beaconsfield Upper and Pakenham drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Pakenham has more residents (54,118 vs 2,997); Beaconsfield Upper has higher household incomes ($143,260 vs $86,528).
| Beaconsfield Upper | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,997 | 54,118 +1706% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +4.8% | +16.6% |
| Median age | 42 | 33 |
| Median household income | $143,260/yr +40% vs other | $86,528/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $368/wk +5% vs other | $351/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.5%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (6.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Beaconsfield Upper | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,322,500 | $700,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $515,000 |
| Median land price | $1,155,500 | $525,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 37 days from 14 sales | 28 days from 638 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
16 vs 767 sales
30 vs 598 sales
6 vs 39 sales
Zoning mix
Beaconsfield Upper has more land zoned for conservation (58% vs 3%); Pakenham has more rural and farming land (45% vs 31%).
| Beaconsfield Upper | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental | 58% | 3% |
| Rural and farming | 31% | 45% |
| Residential | 4% | 29% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 4% | 8% |
| Other and special use | 0% | 6% |
| Industrial | 0% | 5% |
| Parks and recreation | 3% same for both | |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Beaconsfield Upper | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,323 across Cardinia same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +13% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Beaconsfield Upper | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 4.2% $580/wk on $718K |
| Units | — | 4.9% $510/wk on $545K |
Ranking within VIC
| Beaconsfield Upper | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 73% of VIC | Higher than 41% of VIC |
| Income | Higher than 97% of VIC | Higher than 56% of VIC |
| Schools | — | Higher than 34% of VIC |
| Walkability | Higher than 83% of VIC | Higher than 98% of VIC |
| Affordability | Higher than 71% of VIC | Higher than 67% of VIC |
| EV adoption | Higher than 81% of VIC | Higher than 69% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 80% of VIC | Higher than 87% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 80% of VIC |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 54% of VIC |
Liveability
Pakenham is more walkable (94 vs 32); Beaconsfield Upper scores higher overall (67 vs 36).
| Beaconsfield Upper | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | C |
| Score | 67/100 | 36/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 |
Risk profile
Pakenham carries more flood risk (78 vs 22); Pakenham carries more crime risk (74 vs 24).
| Beaconsfield Upper | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 68/100 | Moderate 56/100 |
| Crime | Low 24/100 | High 74/100 |
| Flood | Low 22/100 | High 78/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 9 within 5 km |
Schools
| Beaconsfield Upper | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 15 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 7 |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 4 |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 Federation University Berwick, 8.1 km | None |
Schools in Beaconsfield Upper
- Beaconsfield Upper Primary School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Pakenham
- Beaconhills College Independent · Combined above peers
- Kuyim Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Lakeside College Independent · Combined at peers
- Pakenham Consolidated School Government · Primary at peers
- Pakenham Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Pakenham Secondary College Government · Secondary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Beaconsfield Upper | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 9 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 3 | 18 |
| Parks & reserves | 9 | 26 |
| Childcare | 4 | 39 |
| GPs | 1 | 13 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 8 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 6 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 10 |
| EV chargers | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 22 | 43 |
Mobility
Pakenham sits further from the CBD (62.4 km vs 55.4 km).
| Beaconsfield Upper | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 32/100 | 94/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 55.4 km | 62.4 km +13% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 54 min | 53 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.2% postcode 3808 | 0.8% postcode 3810 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 56 postcode 3808 | 43 postcode 3810 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (71.5%).
Setting
| Beaconsfield Upper | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 206 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 34 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 24.3 km | 16.4 km |
NBN connectivity
| Beaconsfield Upper | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 70/100 | 77/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 50% 982 premises | 59% 21,915 premises |
Climate
| Beaconsfield Upper | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 781 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Beaconsfield Upper | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 20.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.98 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Beaconsfield Upper | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,880/yr same for both | |
| Council | Cardinia same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Beaconsfield Upper | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | La Trobe same for both | |
| Member | Jason Wood same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Beaconsfield Upper | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Pakenham
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Beaconsfield Upper
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.