Beaconsfield Upper vs Pakenham Upper
In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Pakenham Upper: a median of $1.63 million, against $1.32 million in Beaconsfield Upper, though rent is higher in Beaconsfield Upper. On these figures, Beaconsfield Upper tends to suit buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Beaconsfield Upper
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more childcare (4 vs 0)
- has more parks and reserves (9 vs 6)
- carries lower crime risk (24/100 vs 35/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Beaconsfield Upper
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper houses ($1,322,500 vs $1,632,500)
- has cheaper land ($1,155,500 vs $1,375,000)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Pakenham Upper
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($255/wk vs $368/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Beaconsfield Upper
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (32/100 vs 10/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (55.4 km vs 67 km)
- has a shorter drive in (54 min vs 62 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Beaconsfield Upper
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (32/100 vs 10/100)
- carries lower crime risk (24/100 vs 35/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Beaconsfield Upper and Pakenham Upper drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Beaconsfield Upper has more residents (2,997 vs 1,196); Beaconsfield Upper rents higher ($368/wk vs $255/wk).
| Beaconsfield Upper | Pakenham Upper | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,997 +60% vs other | 1,196 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +4.8% | +2.0% |
| Median age | 42 | 44 |
| Median household income | $143,260/yr +6% vs other | $134,836/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $368/wk +31% vs other | $255/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.2%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.7%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Beaconsfield Upper | Pakenham Upper | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,322,500 | $1,632,500 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $1,155,500 | $1,375,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 37 days from 14 sales | — |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
16 vs 5 sales
30 vs 6 sales
Zoning mix
| Beaconsfield Upper | Pakenham Upper | |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental | 58% same for both | |
| Rural and farming | 31% | 35% |
| Parks and recreation | 3% | 6% |
| Residential | 4% | 0% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 4% | 1% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Beaconsfield Upper | Pakenham Upper | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,323 across Cardinia same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +13% same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Beaconsfield Upper | Pakenham Upper | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 73% of VIC | — |
| Income | Higher than 97% of VIC | Higher than 95% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 83% of VIC | Higher than 69% of VIC |
| Affordability | Higher than 71% of VIC | — |
| EV adoption | Higher than 81% of VIC | Higher than 69% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 80% of VIC | Higher than 39% of VIC |
Liveability
Beaconsfield Upper is more walkable (32 vs 10); Beaconsfield Upper scores higher overall (67 vs 46).
| Beaconsfield Upper | Pakenham Upper | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | C |
| Score | 67/100 | 46/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Pakenham Upper carries more flood risk (39 vs 22); Pakenham Upper carries more crime risk (35 vs 24).
| Beaconsfield Upper | Pakenham Upper | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 68/100 | High 99/100 |
| Crime | Low 24/100 | Low 35/100 |
| Flood | Low 22/100 | Low 39/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Beaconsfield Upper | Pakenham Upper | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 Federation University Berwick, 8.1 km | None |
Schools in Beaconsfield Upper
- Beaconsfield Upper Primary School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Pakenham Upper
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Beaconsfield Upper | Pakenham Upper | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 3 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 9 | 6 |
| Childcare | 4 | 0 |
| GPs | 1 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 22 | 9 |
Mobility
Pakenham Upper sits further from the CBD (67 km vs 55.4 km).
| Beaconsfield Upper | Pakenham Upper | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 32/100 | 10/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 55.4 km | 67 km +21% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 54 min | 62 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.2% postcode 3808 | 0.8% postcode 3810 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 56 postcode 3808 | 43 postcode 3810 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (65.7%).
Setting
| Beaconsfield Upper | Pakenham Upper | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 206 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 189 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 24.3 km | 24.0 km |
NBN connectivity
| Beaconsfield Upper | Pakenham Upper | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 70/100 | 29/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 50% 982 premises | 0% 399 premises |
Climate
| Beaconsfield Upper | Pakenham Upper | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 781 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Beaconsfield Upper | Pakenham Upper | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 20.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.98 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Beaconsfield Upper | Pakenham Upper | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,880/yr same for both | |
| Council | Cardinia same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Beaconsfield Upper | Pakenham Upper | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | La Trobe same for both | |
| Member | Jason Wood same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Beaconsfield Upper | Pakenham Upper | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Beaconsfield Upper
Other comparisons with Pakenham Upper
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.