Beaconsfield vs Flowery Gully
Beaconsfield is the younger of the two, with a median age of 46 against 53 in Flowery Gully. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Beaconsfield, about half of households are people living alone. In Flowery Gully, about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Beaconsfield tends to suit people living alone, while Flowery Gully suits couples and older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 5 things we measure here
- Beaconsfield has more parks and reserves (7 vs 1)
- Flowery Gully is already more of a family suburb (79% vs 46%)
Weighs schools, house stock, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Beaconsfield
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($230/wk vs $358/wk)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
Flowery Gully
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (179 min vs 188 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (243.1 km vs 246.6 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Flowery Gully
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more residents already 65 and over (32% vs 22%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, and walkability.
Investors
Beaconsfield
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (4.9% vs -5.7%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Beaconsfield and Flowery Gully drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Beaconsfield has more residents (1,362 vs 82); Flowery Gully rents higher ($358/wk vs $230/wk).
| Beaconsfield | Flowery Gully | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,362 +94% vs other | 82 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +4.9% | -5.7% |
| Median age | 46 | 53 |
| Median household income | $48,568/yr | $71,500/yr +47% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $230/wk | $358/wk +56% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (25.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.3%).
Property market
| Beaconsfield | Flowery Gully | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $467,500 | — |
| Median unit price | $317,000 | — |
| Median land price | $95,000 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 25 days from 19 sales | — |
Zoning mix
Flowery Gully has more rural and farming land (100% vs 89%).
| Beaconsfield | Flowery Gully | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 89% | 100% |
| Environmental | 9% | 0% |
| Residential | 1% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Beaconsfield | Flowery Gully | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 159 across West Tamar same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +11% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Beaconsfield | Flowery Gully | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 6.1% $570/wk on $482K | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within TAS
| Beaconsfield | Flowery Gully | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 19% of TAS | Higher than 58% of TAS |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 68% of TAS | Higher than 42% of TAS |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 23% of TAS same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 82% of TAS | Higher than 31% of TAS |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 99% of TAS | — |
Liveability
| Beaconsfield | Flowery Gully | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | D | — |
| Score | 27/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | high-need area decile 1/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Beaconsfield carries more bushfire risk (49 vs 27).
| Beaconsfield | Flowery Gully | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 49/100 | Low 27/100 |
| Crime | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Beaconsfield | Flowery Gully | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Beaconsfield
- Beaconsfield Primary School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Flowery Gully
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Beaconsfield | Flowery Gully | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 2 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 2 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 7 | 1 |
| Childcare | 1 | 0 |
| GPs | 1 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 0 |
| Hospitals | 1 | 0 |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 1 same for both | |
Mobility
Beaconsfield sits further from the CBD (246.6 km vs 243.1 km).
| Beaconsfield | Flowery Gully | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 4/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Hobart | 246.6 km +1% vs other | 243.1 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 188 min | 179 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.3% postcode 7270 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 39 postcode 7270 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (88.0%).
Setting
| Beaconsfield | Flowery Gully | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 132 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 212 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 9.1 km | 13.6 km |
NBN connectivity
| Beaconsfield | Flowery Gully | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 65/100 | 26/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 40% 785 premises | 0% 33 premises |
Climate
| Beaconsfield | Flowery Gully | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 698 mm | 720 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | 21.6°C | — |
| Winter min (Jul) | 5.1°C | — |
Council rates
| Beaconsfield | Flowery Gully | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,859/yr same for both | |
| Council | West Tamar same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Beaconsfield | Flowery Gully | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Bass same for both | |
| Member | Jess Teesdale same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Beaconsfield | Flowery Gully | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $20,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Beaconsfield
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Beaconsfield
Other comparisons with Flowery Gully
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.