Beaconsfield vs Mount Pleasant
Beaconsfield is the younger of the two, with a median age of 37 against 41 in Mount Pleasant. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. On these figures, Mount Pleasant tends to suit people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Beaconsfield
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more schools inside the suburb (4 vs 0)
- has more childcare (10 vs 6)
- is already more of a family suburb (64% vs 55%)
- But Mount Pleasant carries lower crime risk (11/100 vs 59/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Beaconsfield
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($350/wk vs $390/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Mount Pleasant
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (84/100 vs 49/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (969.3 km vs 973 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Mount Pleasant
ahead on 4 of the 5 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (11/100 vs 59/100)
- has more GPs (4 vs 0)
- is more walkable (84/100 vs 49/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Beaconsfield and Mount Pleasant drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Beaconsfield has more residents (5,899 vs 4,694); Mount Pleasant rents higher ($390/wk vs $350/wk).
| Beaconsfield | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,899 +20% vs other | 4,694 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +7.4% | +5.6% |
| Median age | 37 | 41 |
| Median household income | $89,752/yr +2% vs other | $87,672/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $350/wk | $390/wk +11% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (13.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (2.7%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.3%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Beaconsfield | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $692,550 | $711,000 |
| Median unit price | $530,000 | — |
| Median land price | $260,000 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 27 days from 79 sales | 27 days from 59 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
140 vs 56 sales
138 vs 38 sales
14 vs 14 sales
Development activity
| Beaconsfield | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 574 across Mackay same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -6% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Beaconsfield | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 5.1% $730/wk on $739K | 5.0% $672/wk on $699K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Beaconsfield | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 63% of QLD | Higher than 61% of QLD |
| Schools | Higher than 64% of QLD | — |
| Walkability | Higher than 87% of QLD | Higher than 97% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 41% of QLD | Higher than 40% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 88% of QLD | Higher than 78% of QLD |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 93% of QLD | Higher than 91% of QLD |
Liveability
Mount Pleasant is more walkable (84 vs 49); Mount Pleasant scores higher overall (72 vs 51).
| Beaconsfield | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | A |
| Score | 51/100 | 72/100 |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 |
Risk profile
Beaconsfield carries more crime risk (59 vs 11).
| Beaconsfield | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 59/100 | Low 11/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Beaconsfield | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 4 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
Schools in Beaconsfield
- Whitsunday Anglican School Independent · Combined above peers
- Beaconsfield State School Government · Primary at peers
- Carlisle Adventist College Independent · Combined below peers
- Mackay District Special School Government · Combined · Special school
Schools in Mount Pleasant
- Emmanuel Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary above peers
- Holy Spirit College Catholic · Secondary above peers
- Northview State School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Beaconsfield | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 2 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 same for both | |
| Childcare | 10 | 6 |
| GPs | 0 | 4 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 3 |
| Hospitals | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 5 |
Mobility
Beaconsfield sits further from the CBD (973 km vs 969.3 km).
| Beaconsfield | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 49/100 | 84/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 973 km | 969.3 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 670 min | 666 min |
| Public transport score | 38/100 Bus | 56/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 10.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 19.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 3 min scheduled, not actual | 2 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.3% postcode 4740 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 56 postcode 4740 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (85.2%).
Setting
| Beaconsfield | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 5 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 21 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 4.4 km | 6.1 km |
NBN connectivity
| Beaconsfield | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 76/100 | 69/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Fibre to the node |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 56% 2,548 premises | 40% 2,368 premises |
Climate
| Beaconsfield | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,633 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.6°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 14.5°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Beaconsfield | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.6 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.9 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Beaconsfield | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,873/yr same for both | |
| Council | Mackay same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Beaconsfield | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Dawson same for both | |
| Member | Andrew Willcox same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Beaconsfield | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Beaconsfield
Mount Pleasant
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Beaconsfield
Other comparisons with Mount Pleasant
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.