Batesford vs Stonehaven
Batesford is the younger of the two, with a median age of 39 against 44 in Stonehaven. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. On these figures, Batesford tends to suit families with children and couples, while Stonehaven suits people living alone and older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Batesford
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (28/100 vs 44/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (85% vs 57%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Batesford
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (12% vs 18%)
- has cheaper rent ($325/wk vs $485/wk)
- But Stonehaven has a bigger rental market to choose from (19% vs 3%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Batesford
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (29/100 vs 0/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (75.6 km vs 83.3 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Batesford
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (29/100 vs 0/100)
- carries lower crime risk (28/100 vs 44/100)
- But Stonehaven has more residents already 65 and over (24% vs 12%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Batesford
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (19.9% vs -2.5%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Batesford and Stonehaven drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Batesford has more residents (1,141 vs 79); Stonehaven rents higher ($485/wk vs $325/wk).
| Batesford | Stonehaven | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,141 +93% vs other | 79 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +19.9% | -2.5% |
| Median age | 39 | 44 |
| Median household income | $147,524/yr +3% vs other | $143,000/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $325/wk | $485/wk +49% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.5%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.8%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Batesford | Stonehaven | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,985,000 | — |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $1,030,000 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 30 days from 4 sales | — |
Zoning mix
Stonehaven has more rural and farming land (99% vs 35%).
| Batesford | Stonehaven | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 35% | 99% |
| Residential | 53% | 0% |
| Environmental | 8% | 0% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 3% | 1% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Batesford | Stonehaven | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 3,468 across Greater Geelong | 186 across Golden Plains |
| Approvals change year on year | +56% | +10% |
Ranking within VIC
| Batesford | Stonehaven | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 98% of VIC | Higher than 97% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 82% of VIC | Higher than 39% of VIC |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 71% of VIC | Higher than 84% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 74% of VIC | Higher than 61% of VIC |
Liveability
Batesford is more walkable (29 vs 0).
| Batesford | Stonehaven | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A | — |
| Score | 70/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 | very advantaged area decile 9/10 |
Risk profile
Stonehaven carries more bushfire risk (17 vs 0); Stonehaven carries more crime risk (44 vs 28).
| Batesford | Stonehaven | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Low 17/100 |
| Crime | Low 28/100 | Moderate 44/100 |
| Flood | High 73/100 | Moderate 48/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km | 2 within 5 km |
Schools
| Batesford | Stonehaven | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 2 Deakin University, Geelong Waterfront Campus, 9.5 km | None |
Schools in Batesford
- Rollins Primary School-Batesford Campus Government · Primary
Schools in Stonehaven
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Batesford | Stonehaven | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 3 | 1 |
Mobility
Stonehaven sits further from the CBD (83.3 km vs 75.6 km).
| Batesford | Stonehaven | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 29/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 75.6 km | 83.3 km +10% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 60 min | 64 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.8% postcode 3213 | 1.3% postcode 3218 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 47 postcode 3213 | 24 postcode 3218 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (66.5%).
Setting
| Batesford | Stonehaven | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 25 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 64 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 7.4 km | 11.7 km |
NBN connectivity
| Batesford | Stonehaven | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 56/100 | 30/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 32% 431 premises | 0% 35 premises |
Climate
| Batesford | Stonehaven | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 454 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 26.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 5.5°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Batesford | Stonehaven | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 20.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Batesford | Stonehaven | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,802/yr | $2,052/yr |
| Council | Greater Geelong | Golden Plains |
Federal electorate
| Batesford | Stonehaven | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Corio same for both | |
| Member | Richard Marles same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Batesford | Stonehaven | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Batesford
Other comparisons with Stonehaven
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.