Baskerville vs Belhus
Baskerville is the younger of the two, with a median age of 49 against 54 in Belhus. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Baskerville, about half of households are couple families. In Belhus, most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Belhus: a median of $2.3 million, against $2 million in Baskerville, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Belhus tends to suit couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Too close to call
Nothing among the 6 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Baskerville
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($2,000,000 vs $2,300,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Baskerville
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (16% vs 4%)
- leaves renters under less rental stress (17% vs 27%)
- has cheaper rent ($353/wk vs $500/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Too close to call
Nothing among the 5 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Baskerville
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (4.9% vs -5.0%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Baskerville and Belhus drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Belhus rents higher ($500/wk vs $353/wk); Baskerville has higher household incomes ($108,628 vs $96,200).
| Baskerville | Belhus | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 302 +13% vs other | 264 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +4.9% | -5.0% |
| Median age | 49 | 54 |
| Median household income | $108,628/yr +11% vs other | $96,200/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $353/wk | $500/wk +42% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.2%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (12.1%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Baskerville | Belhus | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2,000,000 | $2,300,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $700,000 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 103 days from 4 sales | — |
Development activity
| Baskerville | Belhus | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 2,486 across Swan same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +2% same for both | |
Ranking within WA
| Baskerville | Belhus | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 74% of WA | Higher than 60% of WA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 73% of WA | Higher than 76% of WA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 69% of WA | Higher than 80% of WA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 59% of WA | Higher than 79% of WA |
Liveability
| Baskerville | Belhus | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 | very advantaged area decile 10/10 |
Risk profile
Baskerville carries more bushfire risk (84 vs 0); Belhus carries more flood risk (77 vs 48).
| Baskerville | Belhus | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 84/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 65/100 | Moderate 63/100 |
| Flood | Moderate 48/100 | High 77/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 3 within 5 km | 4 within 5 km |
Schools
| Baskerville | Belhus | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Baskerville | Belhus | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 1 | 3 |
Mobility
| Baskerville | Belhus | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 16/100 | 23/100 |
| Distance to Perth | 33.9 km +4% vs other | 32.4 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 37 min | 35 min |
| Public transport score | 31/100 Bus | 52/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 8.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 19.5 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.8% postcode 6056 | 1.1% postcode 6069 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 56 postcode 6056 | 83 postcode 6069 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (66.7%).
Setting
| Baskerville | Belhus | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 34 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 19 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 28.6 km | 25.3 km |
NBN connectivity
| Baskerville | Belhus | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 | 66/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 143 premises | 45% 110 premises |
Climate
| Baskerville | Belhus | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 592 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 33.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.5°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Baskerville | Belhus | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,699/yr same for both | |
| Council | Swan same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Baskerville | Belhus | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Hasluck same for both | |
| Member | Tania Lawrence same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Baskerville | Belhus | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $800,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Baskerville
Other comparisons with Belhus
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.