Bar Point vs Mount White
Bar Point is the younger of the two, with a median age of 52 against 58 in Mount White. In both, most homes are detached houses and most households are people living alone. In Bar Point, the large majority of households own their home. In Mount White, about half of households rent. On these figures, Mount White tends to suit renters.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Bar Point has more separate houses rather than flats (94% vs 65%)
- Mount White carries lower crime risk (65/100 vs 76/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Bar Point
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (31% vs 48%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Mount White
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (45% vs 17%)
- has cheaper rent ($250/wk vs $300/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Mount White
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has a shorter drive in (56 min vs 68 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Mount White
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (35% vs 6%)
- carries lower crime risk (65/100 vs 76/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Bar Point
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (90.6% vs -6.6%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Bar Point and Mount White drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mount White has more residents (171 vs 122); Bar Point rents higher ($300/wk vs $250/wk).
| Bar Point | Mount White | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 122 | 171 +40% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +90.6% | -6.6% |
| Median age | 52 | 58 |
| Median household income | $58,500/yr | $59,644/yr +2% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $300/wk +17% vs other | $250/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (8.2%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.8%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Bar Point | Mount White | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $670,000 | — |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
Bar Point has more land zoned for conservation (91% vs 40%); Mount White has more rural and farming land (27% vs 0%).
| Bar Point | Mount White | |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental | 91% | 40% |
| Rural and farming | 0% | 27% |
| Parks and recreation | 0% | 25% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 9% | 8% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Bar Point | Mount White | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,441 across Central Coast (NSW) same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +67% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Bar Point | Mount White | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 24% of NSW | — |
| Income | Higher than 20% of NSW | Higher than 21% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 37% of NSW | Higher than 13% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 53% of NSW | — |
| EV adoption | Higher than 82% of NSW | Higher than 83% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 29% of NSW | Higher than 37% of NSW |
Liveability
| Bar Point | Mount White | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Bar Point carries more crime risk (76 vs 65).
| Bar Point | Mount White | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 91/100 | High 89/100 |
| Crime | High 76/100 | Moderate 65/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Bar Point | Mount White | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Bar Point | Mount White | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 same for both | |
| Waterways | 2 | 4 |
Mobility
| Bar Point | Mount White | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Sydney | 62 km +3% vs other | 60.2 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 68 min | 56 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.1% postcode 2083 | 1.1% postcode 2250 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 36 postcode 2083 | 36 postcode 2250 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (100.0%).
Setting
| Bar Point | Mount White | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 138 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 187 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 8.2 km | 11.9 km |
NBN connectivity
| Bar Point | Mount White | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 19/100 | 26/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 46 premises | 0% 83 premises |
Climate
| Bar Point | Mount White | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,176 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Bar Point | Mount White | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,409/yr same for both | |
| Council | Central Coast (NSW) same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Bar Point | Mount White | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Robertson same for both | |
| Member | Gordon Reid same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Bar Point | Mount White | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Bar Point
Other comparisons with Mount White
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.