Bar Point vs Cheero Point
Cheero Point is the younger of the two, with a median age of 41 against 52 in Bar Point. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Bar Point, most households are people living alone. Houses cost more in Cheero Point: a median of $1 million, against $670,000 in Bar Point, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Bar Point tends to suit people living alone and buyers on a tighter budget, while Cheero Point suits young adults.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Cheero Point
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (24/100 vs 76/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (62% vs 29%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Bar Point
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($670,000 vs $1,000,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Bar Point has cheaper rent ($300/wk vs $515/wk)
- Cheero Point leaves renters under less rental stress (21% vs 27%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Cheero Point
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (14/100 vs 0/100)
- has a shorter drive in (51 min vs 68 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (51.5 km vs 62 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Cheero Point
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (14/100 vs 0/100)
- carries lower crime risk (24/100 vs 76/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Bar Point
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (90.6% vs 14.9%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Bar Point and Cheero Point drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Cheero Point has higher household incomes ($126,256 vs $58,500); Cheero Point rents higher ($515/wk vs $300/wk).
| Bar Point | Cheero Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 122 +18% vs other | 100 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +90.6% | +14.9% |
| Median age | 52 | 41 |
| Median household income | $58,500/yr | $126,256/yr +116% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $300/wk | $515/wk +72% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.0%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.0%).
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Bar Point | Cheero Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $670,000 | $1,000,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
Bar Point has more land zoned for conservation (91% vs 47%).
| Bar Point | Cheero Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental | 91% | 47% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 9% | 44% |
| Parks and recreation | 0% | 8% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Bar Point | Cheero Point | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,441 across Central Coast (NSW) same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +67% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Bar Point | Cheero Point | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 24% of NSW | Higher than 51% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 20% of NSW | Higher than 87% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 37% of NSW | Higher than 63% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 53% of NSW | Higher than 79% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 82% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 29% of NSW | Higher than 12% of NSW |
Liveability
Cheero Point is more walkable (14 vs 0).
| Bar Point | Cheero Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | very advantaged area decile 10/10 |
Risk profile
Bar Point carries more crime risk (76 vs 24).
| Bar Point | Cheero Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 91/100 | High 100/100 |
| Crime | High 76/100 | Low 24/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Bar Point | Cheero Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Bar Point | Cheero Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 2 | 0 |
Mobility
Bar Point sits further from the CBD (62 km vs 51.5 km).
| Bar Point | Cheero Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 14/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 62 km +17% vs other | 51.5 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 68 min | 51 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.1% postcode 2083 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 36 postcode 2083 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (100.0%).
Setting
| Bar Point | Cheero Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 138 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 2 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 8.2 km | 5.6 km |
NBN connectivity
| Bar Point | Cheero Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 19/100 | 15/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 46 premises | 0% 10 premises |
Climate
| Bar Point | Cheero Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,176 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Bar Point | Cheero Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,409/yr same for both | |
| Council | Central Coast (NSW) same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Bar Point | Cheero Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Robertson same for both | |
| Member | Gordon Reid same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Bar Point | Cheero Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Cheero Point
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Bar Point
Other comparisons with Cheero Point
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.