Banks Pocket vs North Deep Creek
Banks Pocket is the younger of the two, with a median age of 46 against 52 in North Deep Creek. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Banks Pocket, the large majority of households are couple families. In North Deep Creek, about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Banks Pocket tends to suit couples, while North Deep Creek suits people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Banks Pocket
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (20/100 vs 61/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (88% vs 59%)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (109% vs 97%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
North Deep Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($300/wk vs $390/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Banks Pocket
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (127 min vs 133 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (172.8 km vs 180.3 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Banks Pocket
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (20/100 vs 61/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Banks Pocket
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (19.9% vs -1.0%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Banks Pocket and North Deep Creek drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
North Deep Creek has more residents (388 vs 187); Banks Pocket has higher household incomes ($111,436 vs $71,864).
| Banks Pocket | North Deep Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 187 | 388 +107% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +19.9% | -1.0% |
| Median age | 46 | 52 |
| Median household income | $111,436/yr +36% vs other | $71,864/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $390/wk +23% vs other | $300/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.6%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.3%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Banks Pocket | North Deep Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,008,000 | $945,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $1,080,000 |
Development activity
| Banks Pocket | North Deep Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 467 across Gympie same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +16% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Banks Pocket | North Deep Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 83% of QLD | Higher than 41% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 69% of QLD | Higher than 39% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 43% of QLD | Higher than 44% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 76% of QLD | Higher than 39% of QLD |
Liveability
| Banks Pocket | North Deep Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 | below-average income decile 3/10 |
Risk profile
North Deep Creek carries more bushfire risk (31 vs 0); North Deep Creek carries more crime risk (61 vs 20).
| Banks Pocket | North Deep Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Low 31/100 |
| Crime | Low 20/100 | Moderate 61/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 5 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Banks Pocket | North Deep Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Banks Pocket | North Deep Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 0 | 8 |
Mobility
North Deep Creek sits further from the CBD (180.3 km vs 172.8 km).
| Banks Pocket | North Deep Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 6/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 172.8 km | 180.3 km +4% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 127 min | 133 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.3% postcode 4570 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 83 postcode 4570 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (89.6%).
Setting
| Banks Pocket | North Deep Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 85 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 121 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 40.7 km | 35.4 km |
NBN connectivity
| Banks Pocket | North Deep Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 65/100 | 28/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 39% 66 premises | 0% 162 premises |
Climate
| Banks Pocket | North Deep Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,045 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.9°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 7.7°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Banks Pocket | North Deep Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,936/yr same for both | |
| Council | Gympie same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Banks Pocket | North Deep Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Wide Bay same for both | |
| Member | Llew O'Brien same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Banks Pocket | North Deep Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Banks Pocket
Other comparisons with North Deep Creek
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.