Banjup vs Treeby
Treeby is the younger of the two, with a median age of 32 against 42 in Banjup. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Banjup: a median of $1.75 million, against $975,000 in Treeby. Treeby is closer to the city centre: 23.8 km, against 27.3 km. On these figures, Treeby tends to suit young adults, families with children, and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Treeby
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (14 vs 1)
- has more childcare (4 vs 0)
- But Banjup has more separate houses rather than flats (99% vs 79%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Treeby
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($975,000 vs $1,750,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Treeby
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- sits closer to the CBD (23.8 km vs 27.3 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 5 things we measure here
- Banjup has more residents already 65 and over (17% vs 11%)
- Treeby has more units and townhouses to downsize into (21% vs 1%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Treeby
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (4.4% vs 2.8%)
Weighs house yield.
Where they sit
Banjup and Treeby drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Treeby has more residents (4,214 vs 1,377); Banjup skews older (42 vs 32).
| Banjup | Treeby | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,377 | 4,214 +206% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | — same for both | |
| Median age | 42 | 32 |
| Median household income | $130,364/yr +1% vs other | $128,908/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $450/wk same for both | |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (27.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.0%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (6.3%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Banjup | Treeby | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,750,000 | $975,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $773,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 46 days from 4 sales | 29 days from 144 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
5 vs 90 sales
5 vs 5 sales
Development activity
| Banjup | Treeby | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,395 across Cockburn same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +14% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Banjup | Treeby | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 2.8% $1,200/wk on $2.2M | 4.4% $850/wk on $1M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within WA
| Banjup | Treeby | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 92% of WA | Higher than 91% of WA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 70% of WA | Higher than 74% of WA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 90% of WA | Higher than 91% of WA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 79% of WA | Higher than 99% of WA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 4% of WA | Higher than 53% of WA |
Liveability
Treeby scores higher overall (72 vs 64).
| Banjup | Treeby | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | A |
| Score | 64/100 | 72/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 | very advantaged area decile 10/10 |
Risk profile
Banjup carries more bushfire risk (50 vs 34).
| Banjup | Treeby | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 50/100 | Low 34/100 |
| Crime | Low 37/100 | Moderate 42/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 | Moderate 50/100 |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km | 4 within 5 km |
Schools
| Banjup | Treeby | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | None | 1 Murdoch University (Murdoch), 7.7 km |
Schools in Banjup
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Treeby
- Treeby Primary School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Banjup | Treeby | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 14 |
| Childcare | 0 | 4 |
| Waterways | 0 | 1 |
Mobility
Banjup sits further from the CBD (27.3 km vs 23.8 km).
| Banjup | Treeby | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 10/100 | 17/100 |
| Distance to Perth | 27.3 km +13% vs other | 23.8 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 27 min | 24 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus | 77/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 42.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 52.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.5% postcode 6164 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 72 postcode 6164 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (75.9%).
Setting
| Banjup | Treeby | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 24 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 33 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 10.5 km | 12.2 km |
NBN connectivity
| Banjup | Treeby | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 66/100 | 100/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 42% 411 premises | 99% 2,409 premises |
Climate
| Banjup | Treeby | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 745 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 31.4°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 7.6°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Banjup | Treeby | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,754/yr same for both | |
| Council | Cockburn same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Banjup | Treeby | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Fremantle same for both | |
| Member | Josh Wilson same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Banjup | Treeby | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $800,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Banjup
Other comparisons with Treeby
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.